4.1 sec in total
321 ms
3.4 sec
438 ms
Visit conact.de now to see the best up-to-date CONact content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about conact.de
Benchmarking-Software für Praxen / Medizinbereich / NPL / Consulting / Turnaround / Interim Management
Visit conact.deWe analyzed Conact.de page load time and found that the first response time was 321 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
conact.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
321 ms
438 ms
176 ms
265 ms
599 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Conact.de, 98% (53 requests) were made to Conact.it. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Conact.it.
Page size can be reduced by 805.0 kB (49%)
1.6 MB
837.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Conact.de main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 844.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 504 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 504 B or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 177.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CONact needs image optimization as it can save up to 177.2 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 255.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 255.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 371.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conact.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 371.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (49%)
51
26
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CONact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
conact.de
321 ms
de
438 ms
jcemediabox.css
176 ms
style.css
265 ms
bootstrap.min.css
599 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
380 ms
font-awesome.css
435 ms
mobile-menu.css
297 ms
template.css
394 ms
uikit.gradient.css
729 ms
preset1.css
433 ms
tlpteam.css
654 ms
main.css
539 ms
creative_buttons.css
578 ms
creativecss-ui.css
669 ms
jcemediabox.js
771 ms
jquery.min.js
897 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
707 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
775 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
804 ms
bootstrap.min.js
857 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
849 ms
helix.core.js
885 ms
menu.js
1110 ms
uikit.js
1121 ms
creativelib.js
1133 ms
creativelib-ui.js
1110 ms
mousewheel.js
1119 ms
creativeimageslider.js
1207 ms
popup.html
150 ms
tooltip.html
153 ms
Logo-conact.png
144 ms
ita.png
188 ms
eng.png
161 ms
ger.png
166 ms
slider.jpg
389 ms
cis_button_left26.png
285 ms
cis_button_right26.png
297 ms
loading.gif
275 ms
McDelivery-small.png
715 ms
loading1.gif
321 ms
assegno-III-s.jpg
403 ms
bank-demolition-frankfurt-small.jpg
409 ms
slide-internazionalizzazione.jpg
543 ms
cardriving3.avi.gif
974 ms
weltbuero-services.png
542 ms
2016-jan-Namibia0giraffesmall.jpg
644 ms
play.png
523 ms
pause.png
631 ms
close.png
666 ms
bg_overlay.png
658 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
787 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
846 ms
glyphicons-halflings-white.png
374 ms
conact.de accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
conact.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
conact.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conact.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Conact.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
conact.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CONact. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: