Tools & Wizards About Us
conduit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

conduit.com

Conduit

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

129 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

4 sec

conduit.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to conduit.com homepage info - get ready to check Conduit best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about conduit.com

Conduit. EMPOWERING BUSINESSES WITH CLOUD-BASED SOLUTIONS SINCE 2005

Visit conduit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Conduit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

conduit.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

conduit.com

129 ms

reset.css

31 ms

foundation.min.css

111 ms

style.css

48 ms

jquery.min.js

14 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Conduit.com, 20% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.s3.conduit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 277.4 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

964.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Conduit.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 833.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 10.7 kB
  • After minification 7.9 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.9 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 833.5 kB
  • After minification 822.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Conduit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 108.4 kB

  • Original 223.3 kB
  • After minification 222.6 kB
  • After compression 115.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 108.4 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 149.9 kB

  • Original 174.7 kB
  • After minification 169.8 kB
  • After compression 24.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conduit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 149.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (53%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conduit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

conduit.com

conduit.com

129 ms

reset.css

reset.css

31 ms

foundation.min.css

foundation.min.css

111 ms

style.css

style.css

48 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

14 ms

what-input.js

what-input.js

30 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

108 ms

custom.js

custom.js

45 ms

css

css

199 ms

conduit-logo-header-new.png

conduit-logo-header-new.png

1296 ms

map.jpg

map.jpg

1308 ms

conduit-logo-header-black-new.png

conduit-logo-header-black-new.png

1265 ms

Conduit_HP_Header-01.png

Conduit_HP_Header-01.png

1278 ms

signature.jpg

signature.jpg

1277 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

36 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

476 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

479 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

478 ms

ga.js

ga.js

310 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

186 ms

SEO Factors

conduit.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conduit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Conduit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

conduit.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Conduit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: