Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

conservationconstruction.com

Replacement Windows| Conservation Construction | Lakewood Co.

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

353 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

117 ms

conservationconstruction.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Conservation Construction content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about conservationconstruction.com

Replacement Windows. Home Replacement Windows Since 1989. Serving Denver And All Of Its Surrounding Areas. Sinding & Door Replacement.

Visit conservationconstruction.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Conservationconstruction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 353 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

conservationconstruction.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,670 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.233

54/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.0 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

conservationconstruction.com

353 ms

georedirect

168 ms

georedirect

236 ms

google-review.css

17 ms

style.min.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Conservationconstruction.com, 14% (16 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Lh3.googleusercontent.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 159.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Conservationconstruction.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 982.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 147.5 kB

  • Original 177.0 kB
  • After minification 168.1 kB
  • After compression 29.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 982.1 kB
  • After minification 973.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Conservation Construction images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 435.4 kB
  • After minification 435.4 kB
  • After compression 432.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (49%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

50

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conservation Construction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

conservationconstruction.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

conservationconstruction.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

conservationconstruction.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conservationconstruction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Conservationconstruction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Conservation Construction. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: