Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

conservationgateway.org

Conservation Gateway - Home

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

294 ms

conservationgateway.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Conservation Gateway content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about conservationgateway.org

The Conservation Gateway is for the conservation practitioner, scientist and decision-maker. Here we share the best and most up-to-date information we use to inform our work at The Nature Conservancy.

Visit conservationgateway.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Conservationgateway.org page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

conservationgateway.org performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

conservationgateway.org

40 ms

default.aspx

1268 ms

controls.css

50 ms

controls.css

109 ms

corev4.css

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Conservationgateway.org, 3% (3 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Conservationgateway.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (73%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

529.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Conservationgateway.org main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 889.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 367.5 kB

  • Original 419.9 kB
  • After minification 416.3 kB
  • After compression 52.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 367.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 72.6 kB

  • Original 299.5 kB
  • After minification 226.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Conservation Gateway needs image optimization as it can save up to 72.6 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 687.4 kB

  • Original 889.6 kB
  • After minification 733.7 kB
  • After compression 202.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 687.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 325.2 kB

  • Original 373.0 kB
  • After minification 266.5 kB
  • After compression 47.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conservationgateway.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 325.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (38%)

Requests Now

104

After Optimization

64

The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conservation Gateway. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

conservationgateway.org accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

conservationgateway.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

conservationgateway.org SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conservationgateway.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Conservationgateway.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Conservation Gateway. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: