2.8 sec in total
292 ms
2.3 sec
177 ms
Visit constructionjournal.com now to see the best up-to-date CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about constructionjournal.com
Win more business with commercial construction leads. Powerful data, tools and analytics to help you stay ahead of your competitors.
Visit constructionjournal.comWe analyzed Constructionjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 292 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
constructionjournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value21.0 s
0/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value3,530 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
292 ms
218 ms
75 ms
268 ms
375 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Constructionjournal.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Ecn.dev.virtualearth.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Constructionjournal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 902.2 kB (36%)
2.5 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Constructionjournal.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 706.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 706.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 94.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Constructionjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 94.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (32%)
100
68
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
constructionjournal.com
292 ms
Site.css
218 ms
home_top.js
75 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
268 ms
galleria-1.2.8.min.js
375 ms
WebResource.axd
101 ms
WebResource.axd
122 ms
helper.css
119 ms
ScriptResource.axd
705 ms
ScriptResource.axd
239 ms
ScriptResource.axd
150 ms
ScriptResource.axd
187 ms
ScriptResource.axd
191 ms
ScriptResource.axd
228 ms
ScriptResource.axd
235 ms
ScriptResource.axd
245 ms
ScriptResource.axd
263 ms
ScriptResource.axd
269 ms
ScriptResource.axd
274 ms
ScriptResource.axd
279 ms
ScriptResource.axd
296 ms
ScriptResource.axd
304 ms
iMAWebCookie.js
17 ms
construction_journal_logo.gif
40 ms
a.gif
35 ms
nav1_dormant.gif
40 ms
nav2_dormant.gif
43 ms
nav3_dormant.gif
37 ms
nav4_dormant.gif
73 ms
header_twitter_icon.gif
71 ms
header_linkedin_icon.gif
73 ms
red_login_button.gif
79 ms
browse_construction_leads.gif
78 ms
go_button.gif
109 ms
marquis_2.png
461 ms
marquis_3.png
1512 ms
marquis_4.png
610 ms
marquis_5.png
1751 ms
marquis_6.png
841 ms
marquis_7.png
1342 ms
coverage_areas.gif
461 ms
pan_expand.gif
507 ms
actionable_opportunities.gif
530 ms
latest_construction_leads.gif
546 ms
refresh_latest_projects.gif
585 ms
close_box.gif
622 ms
construction_journal_footer_logo.gif
649 ms
project_information_intelligence_footer.gif
662 ms
footer_free_access_pass.gif
688 ms
footer_social_icon_facebook.gif
700 ms
footer_social_icon_twitter.gif
722 ms
footer_social_icon_linkedin.gif
733 ms
flag_usa_nav.jpg
761 ms
top_blend.gif
340 ms
header_bar_background.gif
369 ms
galleria.classic.min.js
375 ms
coverage_map_mini.aspx
394 ms
feedback.aspx
397 ms
container_left.gif
412 ms
center_metrics_container.gif
514 ms
container_right.gif
432 ms
footer_blend.gif
450 ms
footer_rule.gif
512 ms
ga.js
27 ms
helper.gif
468 ms
like.php
126 ms
__utm.gif
28 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
290 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
340 ms
galleria.classic.css
159 ms
mapcontrol.ashx
90 ms
feedback_close_box.gif
145 ms
tell_us_what_you_think.gif
250 ms
cj_logo_feedback.gif
252 ms
feedback_rules.png
253 ms
feedback_left_top_container.gif
249 ms
rate_your_experience.gif
250 ms
feedback_left_bottom_container.gif
253 ms
describe_yourself.gif
254 ms
feedback_right_container.gif
254 ms
add_your_comments.gif
260 ms
captcha.aspx
261 ms
submit_feedback_button.gif
265 ms
mapcontrol.css
25 ms
r0213.png
72 ms
r0302.png
75 ms
r0231.png
74 ms
r0320.png
72 ms
Log
171 ms
GeoCommunity.aspx
466 ms
logo2.png
22 ms
vecss.png
39 ms
nav_select.gif
24 ms
vecss.gif
24 ms
nav_select_gray.gif
24 ms
classic-loader.gif
47 ms
classic-map.png
58 ms
map_pin_cj.png
61 ms
r0321.png
17 ms
r0303.png
13 ms
map_pin.png
70 ms
blank.gif
90 ms
constructionjournal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
constructionjournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
constructionjournal.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Constructionjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Constructionjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
constructionjournal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: