Access constructor.construction.com. Dodge Construction Network

Report Summary

About Website

Welcome to constructor.construction.com homepage info - get ready to check Constructor Construction best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about constructor.construction.com

Combining the experience and expertise of five trusted brands to give you the most timely and accurate construction information.

Visit constructor.construction.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,240 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.1 s

1/100

10%

constructor.construction.com

16 ms

www.construction.com

80 ms

js

71 ms

tribe-events-pro-mini-calendar-block.min.css

59 ms

style.min.css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Constructor.construction.com, 55% (36 requests) were made to Construction.com and 12% (8 requests) were made to Success.construction.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (831 ms) relates to the external source Construction.com.

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Constructor.construction.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 194.4 kB

Original 226.4 kB
After minification 225.1 kB
After compression 31.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 194.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 838 B

Original 4.0 MB
After minification 4.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Constructor Construction images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 826 B

Original 227.6 kB
After minification 227.6 kB
After compression 226.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

Original 89.7 kB
After minification 89.5 kB
After compression 88.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Constructor.construction.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Constructor Construction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Constructor.construction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Constructor.construction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

constructor.construction.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Constructor Construction. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Dodge Construction Network | Construction Projects and Bidding

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)