8.9 sec in total
1.9 sec
6.4 sec
577 ms
Click here to check amazing Consumer Proposal S content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about consumerproposals.com
We help Canadians get out of debt and back to life. Learn about government debt forgiveness programs that can reduce debts by up to 80%.
Visit consumerproposals.comWe analyzed Consumerproposals.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
consumerproposals.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.9 s
0/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value21.6 s
0/100
10%
Value13,010 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value32.5 s
0/100
10%
1863 ms
120 ms
255 ms
260 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Consumerproposals.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Consumerproposals.com.
Page size can be reduced by 217.1 kB (18%)
1.2 MB
996.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Consumerproposals.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 615.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Consumer Proposal S images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Consumerproposals.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (89%)
66
7
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Consumer Proposal S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
consumerproposals.com
1863 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
120 ms
formidableforms.css
255 ms
style.min.css
260 ms
css
37 ms
style.css
395 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
280 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
285 ms
frontend.min.css
356 ms
post-4059.css
332 ms
all.min.css
308 ms
v4-shims.min.css
354 ms
global.css
353 ms
post-4057.css
424 ms
formreset.min.css
422 ms
formsmain.min.css
425 ms
readyclass.min.css
431 ms
browsers.min.css
430 ms
dashicons.min.css
436 ms
style.min.css
442 ms
font-awesome.min.css
451 ms
css
44 ms
fontawesome.min.css
494 ms
solid.min.css
518 ms
regular.min.css
502 ms
brands.min.css
499 ms
jquery.min.js
544 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
541 ms
recaptcha.js
581 ms
v4-shims.min.js
582 ms
jquery.json.min.js
605 ms
gravityforms.min.js
742 ms
js
66 ms
et-extra-customizer-global-16635363672302.min.css
612 ms
js
96 ms
animations.min.css
694 ms
masonry.min.js
739 ms
scripts.min.js
762 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
738 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
738 ms
dom-ready.min.js
730 ms
hooks.min.js
774 ms
i18n.min.js
636 ms
a11y.min.js
631 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
617 ms
common.js
608 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
561 ms
happy-addons.min.js
651 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
624 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
614 ms
waypoints.min.js
614 ms
core.min.js
544 ms
swiper.min.js
583 ms
share-link.min.js
608 ms
dialog.min.js
593 ms
frontend.min.js
612 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
602 ms
fbevents.js
58 ms
analytics.js
131 ms
conversion_async.js
243 ms
BOXED-SLIDER-3-.jpg
824 ms
slider-1-1.jpg
933 ms
1315437295319562
152 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
153 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
211 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
229 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
233 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
440 ms
ET-Extra.woff
440 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
484 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
438 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
506 ms
collect
177 ms
consumerproposals-logo1.png
298 ms
134 ms
198 ms
consumerproposals.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
consumerproposals.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
consumerproposals.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Consumerproposals.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Consumerproposals.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
consumerproposals.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Consumer Proposal S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: