Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

container-tracking.org

Container tracking

Page Load Speed

619 ms in total

First Response

124 ms

Resources Loaded

344 ms

Page Rendered

151 ms

container-tracking.org screenshot

About Website

Visit container-tracking.org now to see the best up-to-date Container Tracking content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about container-tracking.org

Container tracking: track your container.

Visit container-tracking.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Container-tracking.org page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 495 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

container-tracking.org performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,090 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.239

52/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

container-tracking.org

124 ms

main.css

63 ms

adsbygoogle.js

205 ms

ga.js

16 ms

__utm.gif

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Container-tracking.org, 40% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 20% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (205 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 26.3 kB (23%)

Content Size

114.5 kB

After Optimization

88.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Container-tracking.org main page is 114.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 81.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 30.8 kB
  • After minification 30.7 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 54 B

  • Original 81.2 kB
  • After minification 81.2 kB
  • After compression 81.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 719 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Container-tracking.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Container Tracking. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

container-tracking.org accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

container-tracking.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

container-tracking.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Container-tracking.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Container-tracking.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Container Tracking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: