3.3 sec in total
429 ms
1.8 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Content Current content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about contentcurrent.com
The latest information regarding "what's new" in Search Engine Optimization. What you need to know to keep up with the Web.
Visit contentcurrent.comWe analyzed Contentcurrent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 429 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
contentcurrent.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.9 s
29/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value6.8 s
54/100
10%
429 ms
90 ms
31 ms
43 ms
429 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Contentcurrent.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (684 ms) belongs to the original domain Contentcurrent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 244.5 kB (71%)
345.7 kB
101.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Contentcurrent.com main page is 345.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 282.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Current images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 201.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentcurrent.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (73%)
40
11
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Current. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
contentcurrent.com
429 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
90 ms
css
31 ms
css
43 ms
mythemes-icons.css
429 ms
effects.css
96 ms
header.css
127 ms
bootstrap.min.css
137 ms
typography.css
98 ms
navigation.css
116 ms
nav.css
143 ms
blog.css
150 ms
forms.css
155 ms
elements.css
190 ms
widgets.css
221 ms
comments.css
193 ms
comments-typography.css
196 ms
footer.css
212 ms
prettyPhoto.css
335 ms
plugins.css
342 ms
style.css
234 ms
styles.css
265 ms
jquery.js
325 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
293 ms
bootstrap.min.js
312 ms
masonry.min.js
336 ms
functions.js
349 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
356 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.settings.js
361 ms
jquery.form.min.js
611 ms
scripts.js
609 ms
wp-embed.min.js
607 ms
bkg.jpg
684 ms
contentcurrent.com
681 ms
stock-photo-69113317-social-media-icons.jpg
676 ms
LINK.jpg
119 ms
photodune-7419681-seo-xs-300x199.jpg
122 ms
photodune-9585487-big-brother-everywhere-concept-s-300x225.jpg
675 ms
photodune-12036993-podcast-word-shows-webcast-podcasts-and-streaming-s-300x252.jpg
677 ms
photodune-5396773-fresh-business-young-champion-s-200x300.jpg
675 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
36 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
582 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
582 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
583 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
583 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
583 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
583 ms
9YNLL0bmRhcAAfTIrgAAAA=
32 ms
fontello.svg
612 ms
contentcurrent.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
contentcurrent.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
contentcurrent.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentcurrent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentcurrent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
contentcurrent.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Content Current. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: