4 sec in total
60 ms
3.3 sec
721 ms
Welcome to contentkarma.com homepage info - get ready to check Content Karma best content right away, or after learning these important things about contentkarma.com
Visit contentkarma.comWe analyzed Contentkarma.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
contentkarma.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value10.8 s
6/100
10%
Value820 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.092
91/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
60 ms
39 ms
39 ms
48 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Contentkarma.com, 15% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (704 ms) belongs to the original domain Contentkarma.com.
Page size can be reduced by 105.0 kB (5%)
2.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Contentkarma.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Karma images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentkarma.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (72%)
79
22
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Karma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.contentkarma.com
60 ms
pe-icon-7-stroke.css
39 ms
styles.css
39 ms
settings.css
48 ms
css
47 ms
css
51 ms
css
56 ms
css
55 ms
ts-fab.min.css
52 ms
settings.css
84 ms
style.css
65 ms
main-ltr.css
69 ms
font-awesome.min.css
122 ms
onepage-scroll.css
87 ms
jquery.multiscroll.css
94 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.css
91 ms
animate.min.css
101 ms
jquery.wordrotator.min.css
96 ms
animate.css
111 ms
magnific-popup.css
119 ms
js_composer.min.css
151 ms
css
51 ms
jquery.min.js
128 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
147 ms
lightbox.js
140 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
139 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
233 ms
ts-fab.min.js
241 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
243 ms
jquery.sidr.min.js
243 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
247 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
244 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
244 ms
slidx.js
244 ms
jquery.onepage-scroll.min.js
245 ms
jquery.multiscroll.js
248 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
247 ms
jquery.wordrotator.min.js
249 ms
typed.js
247 ms
js
82 ms
js
125 ms
css
44 ms
lightbox.css
247 ms
index.js
269 ms
index.js
234 ms
wow.min.js
217 ms
jQuery.headroom.min.js
232 ms
headroom.min.js
224 ms
snap.min.js
210 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
195 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
259 ms
waypoints.min.js
255 ms
jquery.easings.min.js
362 ms
main.js
249 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
249 ms
skrollr.min.js
242 ms
ContentKarma-Logo_TransparentRGB.png
75 ms
homeimage1.png
286 ms
Yahoo.png
76 ms
Forbes.png
183 ms
HuffPo.png
184 ms
Wired.png
183 ms
TechCrunch.png
184 ms
Moz.png
391 ms
Home-PR.png
390 ms
Home_Content.png
390 ms
Home_SEO.png
390 ms
Home_Reputation.png
390 ms
Home_Paid.png
388 ms
Home_Social.png
509 ms
small-aap.png
510 ms
logoicon.png
704 ms
js
131 ms
analytics.js
226 ms
js
224 ms
js
221 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmRdo.woff
214 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wmRdo.woff
332 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNq7j.woff
333 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmRdo.woff
525 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwmRdo.woff
525 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwmRdo.woff
524 ms
Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff
331 ms
collect
322 ms
collect
321 ms
contact-image.png
635 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
306 ms
loader.gif
261 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff
15 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrc.woff
19 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
14 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff
15 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff
15 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
16 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
17 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrc.woff
16 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff
16 ms
egfont.woff
307 ms
contentkarma.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
contentkarma.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
contentkarma.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentkarma.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentkarma.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
contentkarma.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Content Karma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: