4 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.2 sec
577 ms
Visit contentmachine.com now to see the best up-to-date Content Machine content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about contentmachine.com
Startups, content marketing and entrepreneurship
Visit contentmachine.comWe analyzed Contentmachine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
contentmachine.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value3.9 s
51/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.8 s
90/100
10%
1244 ms
29 ms
42 ms
43 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Contentmachine.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Contentmachine.com.
Page size can be reduced by 813.8 kB (54%)
1.5 MB
691.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Contentmachine.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 535.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Machine images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 289.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 289.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 450.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentmachine.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 450.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (56%)
64
28
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Machine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
contentmachine.com
1244 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
29 ms
aqpb-view.css
42 ms
aqpb-view-media.css
43 ms
button.css
101 ms
pikaday.css
45 ms
public-pro.css
52 ms
styles.css
50 ms
style.css
54 ms
flexslider.css
59 ms
font-awesome.css
62 ms
magnific-popup.css
64 ms
css
25 ms
contentmachine.com
541 ms
style.min.css
72 ms
default.min.css
144 ms
jquery.js
98 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
78 ms
op-jquery-base-all.min.js
86 ms
css
36 ms
css
52 ms
aqpb-view.js
95 ms
checkout.js
107 ms
parsley.min.js
94 ms
moment.min.js
107 ms
pikaday.js
121 ms
pikaday.jquery.js
112 ms
public-main.js
114 ms
comment-reply.min.js
128 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
131 ms
respond.min.js
132 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
169 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
170 ms
jquery.global.js
169 ms
op-front-all.min.js
172 ms
menus.min.js
172 ms
public-main.css
136 ms
ga.js
92 ms
FF4D00-0.0.png
60 ms
content-machine-cover-orange.jpg
137 ms
500px-Amazon_com_logo_svg.png
62 ms
dan_chilling.jpg
142 ms
mistake.png
59 ms
entrepreneurs.png
60 ms
blueprint.png
62 ms
417.png
63 ms
355.png
64 ms
Untitled-design-7.png
64 ms
4.png
130 ms
3.png
135 ms
2.png
135 ms
joe_pulizzi.jpg
135 ms
damian_thompson.jpg
136 ms
paul_murray.jpg
142 ms
dan_v.jpg
140 ms
scott_oldford.jpg
141 ms
cas_mccullough.jpg
142 ms
frameworks_screenshot1.png
246 ms
3Dfullset_small.jpg
244 ms
dan_norris_801.jpg
143 ms
arrow-8-1.png
144 ms
content_machine_3d_small_for_site1.jpg
245 ms
sdk.js
221 ms
widgets.js
116 ms
plusone.js
102 ms
texture-grey.png
193 ms
1.png
189 ms
UyYrYy3ltEffJV9QueSi4UpeNX8RPf6i6WQfJWyCWEs.ttf
69 ms
Q_pTky3Sc3ubRibGToTAYjnFfol0SnfBMmbnmUK0fZM.ttf
72 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
75 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
74 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
74 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM0DauxaEVho0aInXGvhmB4k.ttf
74 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Edtd7Dq2ZflsctMEexj2lw.ttf
74 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
100 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
100 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
100 ms
contentmachine.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
contentmachine.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
contentmachine.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentmachine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentmachine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
contentmachine.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Content Machine. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: