3.8 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.4 sec
317 ms
Visit contentwatch.com now to see the best up-to-date Content Watch content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about contentwatch.com
The world's best internet filtering- ready to help your business.
Visit contentwatch.comWe analyzed Contentwatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
contentwatch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value12,550 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.339
33/100
15%
Value22.5 s
1/100
10%
1064 ms
251 ms
329 ms
200 ms
265 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Contentwatch.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Contentwatch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 250.1 kB (39%)
642.6 kB
392.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Contentwatch.com main page is 642.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 279.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Watch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 70.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 136.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentwatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 136.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (38%)
32
20
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Watch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.contentwatch.com
1064 ms
bootstrap.min.css
251 ms
layout.css
329 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
200 ms
modernizr-2.0.6.min.js
265 ms
jquery.min.js
97 ms
cwi.jquery.js
151 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
208 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
267 ms
bootstrap.min.js
464 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
257 ms
base.js
258 ms
cwi.popups.js
261 ms
cwi.trial_pro.js
461 ms
cwi.fancybox.js
461 ms
cwi.events.js
461 ms
analytics.js
267 ms
footer-content-bgnoshadow.png
220 ms
mag-glass.png
219 ms
content-watch-logo.png
220 ms
CW-Mast-Image-Large.jpg
270 ms
cw-mast-image-04.jpg
226 ms
cw-mast-image-03.jpg
229 ms
CW-Mast-Image-Small.jpg
222 ms
ContentProtect-for-Android-Logo-no-bkg.png
219 ms
security
430 ms
contentprotect-box-thumb.png
268 ms
cpandroid-thumb.png
268 ms
award-toptenreviews2014-64x100.png
269 ms
cpappliance-gcnlab-award.png
269 ms
footer-shadow-bg.jpg
283 ms
content-watch-logo-footer.png
301 ms
collect
16 ms
contentwatch.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
contentwatch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
contentwatch.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentwatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentwatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
contentwatch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Content Watch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: