1.5 sec in total
99 ms
700 ms
689 ms
Welcome to contitherm.net homepage info - get ready to check Contitherm best content right away, or after learning these important things about contitherm.net
Continetal Thermal Engineers
Visit contitherm.netWe analyzed Contitherm.net page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
contitherm.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value14.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value1,180 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
99 ms
183 ms
35 ms
52 ms
89 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Contitherm.net, 81% (22 requests) were made to Contitherm.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (240 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 33.3 kB (6%)
566.6 kB
533.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Contitherm.net main page is 566.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 387.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 246 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Contitherm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contitherm.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (26%)
23
17
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contitherm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
contitherm.net
99 ms
www.contitherm.com
183 ms
css
35 ms
bootstrap.css
52 ms
fonts.css
89 ms
style.css
96 ms
logo6.png
95 ms
Burners.jpg
130 ms
Blowers.jpg
130 ms
Gas_Trains.jpg
74 ms
pumping-and-heating-unit.jpg
130 ms
Pipeline_Accessories.jpg
133 ms
Pre-heaters.jpg
134 ms
embed
240 ms
core.min.js
178 ms
script.js
128 ms
js
76 ms
cl1.jpg
128 ms
cl2.jpg
127 ms
cl3.jpg
137 ms
cl4.jpg
143 ms
cl5.jpg
145 ms
cl6.jpg
153 ms
parallax-1-1920x1000.jpg
112 ms
js
119 ms
materialdesignicons-webfont.woff
47 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
28 ms
contitherm.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
contitherm.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
contitherm.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contitherm.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contitherm.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
contitherm.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Contitherm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: