12.1 sec in total
1.6 sec
10 sec
488 ms
Welcome to conweigh.net homepage info - get ready to check Conweigh best content right away, or after learning these important things about conweigh.net
If you can't find the right machinery for your unique projects, Olitek can design and build it for you.
Visit conweigh.netWe analyzed Conweigh.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
conweigh.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value20.0 s
0/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value1,540 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.103
89/100
15%
Value24.1 s
0/100
10%
1571 ms
38 ms
225 ms
646 ms
647 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Conweigh.net, 13% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.2 sec) relates to the external source Olitek.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 382.1 kB (9%)
4.3 MB
3.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Conweigh.net main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 210.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Conweigh images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 71.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conweigh.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.6 kB or 36% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (72%)
74
21
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conweigh. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
olitek.com.au
1571 ms
css
38 ms
tpg0ezn.css
225 ms
main.css
646 ms
oxygen.css
647 ms
style.css
643 ms
jquery.min.js
857 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
663 ms
aurora-heatmap.min.js
1308 ms
js
65 ms
iframeResizer.min.js
40 ms
1699.css
1284 ms
1715.css
1286 ms
universal.css
1285 ms
gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css
1149 ms
gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css
1301 ms
gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css
2196 ms
aos.css
2005 ms
formreset.min.css
2009 ms
formsmain.min.css
2009 ms
readyclass.min.css
2007 ms
browsers.min.css
2013 ms
BG_themes_general.css
2622 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
2639 ms
superfish.min.js
2641 ms
superfish.args.min.js
2642 ms
dropdown-menu.min.js
2642 ms
responsive-menus.min.js
2869 ms
aos.js
3260 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
3280 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
3306 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
3737 ms
dom-ready.min.js
3300 ms
hooks.min.js
3527 ms
i18n.min.js
3929 ms
a11y.min.js
3928 ms
jquery.json.min.js
3959 ms
gravityforms.min.js
3969 ms
conditional_logic.min.js
4187 ms
api.js
34 ms
theme.js
4396 ms
utils.min.js
4565 ms
p.css
30 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
4156 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
4175 ms
log.js
158 ms
Olitek-Logo-e1537843173951.png
3725 ms
Employee-collage-Facebook-Cover-2.png
7186 ms
637341004
196 ms
690348542
249 ms
674319258
220 ms
cLNLIUiVqh0
189 ms
olitek-workshop.jpg
5198 ms
induction-hardening.jpg
5166 ms
js
52 ms
analytics.js
98 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
128 ms
d
42 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
128 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
133 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
140 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
144 ms
d
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
145 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
141 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
141 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
140 ms
Grey-Background-1024x717.jpg
4267 ms
olitek.com.au.js
485 ms
collect
23 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
30 ms
www-player.css
11 ms
www-embed-player.js
32 ms
base.js
77 ms
1296736643-ccaf642e2ee1ccf20907fc39f4a984ff4ab46b9805f77fdab
384 ms
1366853088-30348e21e9f8ae5fc7860cf76ba150a9f84858b162df45b617815becbe655934-d
1080 ms
1397881510-608db2176cd66f5c7a8fe37702a085dd30a2799de66045bc6a4c97b3225503c5-d
965 ms
ad_status.js
327 ms
QaMcj-JulTnv9WX-ZKiswnw1NZ6KstGU-WkCl6294a4.js
111 ms
embed.js
59 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
34 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
20 ms
Create
125 ms
id
12 ms
GenerateIT
14 ms
log_event
21 ms
recaptcha__en.js
29 ms
conweigh.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
conweigh.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
conweigh.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conweigh.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Conweigh.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
conweigh.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Conweigh. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: