5.8 sec in total
322 ms
4.8 sec
725 ms
Click here to check amazing Coprocess content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about coprocess.com
Coprocess specialises in intercompany netting. Contact us to discuss netting, recon and vendor payments
Visit coprocess.comWe analyzed Coprocess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 322 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
coprocess.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value3,290 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.047
99/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
322 ms
1121 ms
56 ms
478 ms
409 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Coprocess.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Coprocess.com.
Page size can be reduced by 91.0 kB (13%)
676.7 kB
585.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Coprocess.com main page is 676.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 370.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coprocess images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coprocess.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (64%)
88
32
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coprocess. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
coprocess.com
322 ms
www.coprocess.com
1121 ms
gtm.js
56 ms
jquery.min.js
478 ms
chartist.min.js
409 ms
bootstrap.min.js
436 ms
script-initialisations.min.js
498 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
429 ms
owl-carousel-settings--clients.js
469 ms
style.css
784 ms
content.css
817 ms
jcemediabox.min.css
806 ms
rokbox.css
847 ms
style.min.css
860 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
858 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1164 ms
caption.js
1181 ms
jcemediabox.min.js
1287 ms
mootools-core.js
1363 ms
core.js
1265 ms
mootools-more.js
1425 ms
rokbox.js
1636 ms
template.min.css
1650 ms
css-changes.css
1675 ms
post-css.css
1682 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
1754 ms
css
40 ms
82842.js
39 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
27 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
js
75 ms
insight.min.js
68 ms
track.js
72 ms
in.php
1049 ms
730 ms
1653989733600
697 ms
icon-linkedin.svg
89 ms
icon-twitter.svg
475 ms
icon-facebook.svg
92 ms
Coprocess_Logo_Update_Final-CMYK-Horz.svg
93 ms
menu-dropdown-icon.svg
458 ms
banner-home--lg.jpg
78 ms
btn__arrow--white.svg
466 ms
abb.png
222 ms
air-liquide.png
109 ms
arup.png
116 ms
assaabloy.png
225 ms
AtlasCopco.png
224 ms
basf.png
324 ms
belron.png
325 ms
campari.png
300 ms
continental.png
322 ms
Diebold.png
326 ms
eaton.png
328 ms
edwards.png
325 ms
faiveley.png
330 ms
frieslandcampina.png
329 ms
fujitsu.png
331 ms
hrn.png
333 ms
internationalpaper.png
332 ms
kone.png
332 ms
motorola-solutions.jpg
334 ms
munters.png
335 ms
nestle.png
335 ms
pepperl__fuchs.png
345 ms
sandvik.png
345 ms
stihl.png
343 ms
sulzer.png
369 ms
tti.png
351 ms
universal-music-group.png
369 ms
vetropack.png
369 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
88 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
93 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
202 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
204 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
719 ms
zf-trw.png
316 ms
testimonial-open--lg.svg
612 ms
btn__arrow--blue2-sm.svg
312 ms
team-750.jpg
288 ms
box__arrow--blue2-sm.svg
586 ms
ACT_2022.png
363 ms
corner__arrow.svg
626 ms
ACT_ICC_Wales.jpg
254 ms
event__afp-boston-2019.jpg
256 ms
Intercompany-Netting-850x450.png
163 ms
company-brochure--thumb.jpg
166 ms
img__tresorerie-sorbonne-thumbnail.jpg
171 ms
img__gtreasury-thumb.jpg
171 ms
coprocess-in-news__full.jpg
181 ms
swiss_made.png
172 ms
logo-gdpr.png
161 ms
btn__arrow--blue-left.svg
559 ms
btn__arrow--blue.svg
546 ms
coprocess.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
coprocess.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
coprocess.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coprocess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coprocess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coprocess.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coprocess. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: