1 sec in total
46 ms
909 ms
64 ms
Visit corepro8.com now to see the best up-to-date Corepro 8 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about corepro8.com
Visit corepro8.comWe analyzed Corepro8.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 973 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
corepro8.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
46 ms
133 ms
41 ms
44 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Corepro8.com, 31% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (448 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 876.1 kB (67%)
1.3 MB
426.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Corepro8.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 871.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 871.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Corepro 8 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (39%)
28
17
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Corepro 8. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
corepro8.com
46 ms
www.book-it.ca
133 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
41 ms
minified.js
44 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
76 ms
polyfill.min.js
250 ms
thunderbolt-commons.eb770ee8.bundle.min.js
57 ms
main.578f27a3.bundle.min.js
57 ms
lodash.min.js
56 ms
react.production.min.js
54 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
57 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
55 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
56 ms
logo.png
234 ms
61d2a968c438494ba63caed4fb9465dd.jpg
239 ms
b6c4dbe57f954018ab89dcbe0ea3e54d.jpg
243 ms
11062b_584b53270c45469f8df5da95d3bb2d7d~mv2.jpg
445 ms
598e5b4275d4403c9532fe6a18497ddf.jpg
337 ms
11062b_cae0e985b7e5459bb2cd0f41a85e1acf~mv2.jpg
343 ms
37b434f113a14b43af11b987fe60a905.jpg
370 ms
Personal%20tax%20update%202023.png
383 ms
4e6f10f3eb8646828331ac79b22b67ec.jpg
335 ms
6a09dadbfe8e4b2c844d14f0df73cb86.jpg
429 ms
b6c4dbe57f954018ab89dcbe0ea3e54d.jpg
422 ms
55b0bfb476ba49f1bd945345901ed72a.jpg
448 ms
bundle.min.js
73 ms
160 ms
111 ms
151 ms
160 ms
153 ms
156 ms
116 ms
148 ms
151 ms
156 ms
159 ms
158 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
7 ms
bolt-performance
19 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
corepro8.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
corepro8.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
corepro8.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corepro8.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corepro8.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
corepro8.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Corepro 8. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: