Tools & Wizards About Us
corescientific.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

corescientific.com

High-Density Computing at Scale | Core Scientific

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

695 ms

corescientific.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Core Scientific content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about corescientific.com

Grow your business faster with high-density computing solutions built to scale at Core Scientific. Talk to a data center expert today.

Visit corescientific.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Corescientific.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

corescientific.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,890 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

corescientific.com

117 ms

corescientific.com

227 ms

gtm.js

82 ms

style.min.css

43 ms

styles.css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Corescientific.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (475 ms) relates to the external source S3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 214.6 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Corescientific.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 77.2 kB

  • Original 105.9 kB
  • After minification 101.7 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 33 B

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Core Scientific images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 120.7 kB

  • Original 440.2 kB
  • After minification 426.4 kB
  • After compression 319.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.7 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 67.2 kB
  • After minification 55.2 kB
  • After compression 50.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Corescientific.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (56%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Core Scientific. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

corescientific.com

corescientific.com

117 ms

corescientific.com

corescientific.com

227 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

82 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

43 ms

styles.css

styles.css

42 ms

video-container.min.css

video-container.min.css

66 ms

style.css

style.css

55 ms

text-editor.css

text-editor.css

57 ms

extra-styles.css

extra-styles.css

54 ms

css2

css2

117 ms

slick.css

slick.css

74 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

75 ms

app.513dba.css

app.513dba.css

109 ms

touchcarousel.css

touchcarousel.css

108 ms

three-d-skin.css

three-d-skin.css

106 ms

css2

css2

121 ms

pum-site-styles.css

pum-site-styles.css

106 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

116 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

107 ms

classic-061523.css

classic-061523.css

115 ms

mc-validate.js

mc-validate.js

114 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

121 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

122 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

115 ms

index.js

index.js

115 ms

index.js

index.js

119 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

129 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

296 ms

cute-alert.js

cute-alert.js

128 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

110 ms

three.js

three.js

408 ms

ThreeOrbitControls.js

ThreeOrbitControls.js

475 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

291 ms

jquery.marquee.min.js

jquery.marquee.min.js

293 ms

app.a93686.js

app.a93686.js

289 ms

lottie.min.js

lottie.min.js

467 ms

extra-scripts.js

extra-scripts.js

292 ms

jquery.touchcarousel-1.3.min.js

jquery.touchcarousel-1.3.min.js

293 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

295 ms

pum-site-scripts.js

pum-site-scripts.js

295 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

17 ms

css

css

29 ms

hotjar-2816383.js

hotjar-2816383.js

323 ms

Line-15.png

Line-15.png

455 ms

core-ticker-white.png

core-ticker-white.png

209 ms

bitcoin-btc-logo.svg

bitcoin-btc-logo.svg

195 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

198 ms

DentonAerialBCDBuidlings.jpg

DentonAerialBCDBuidlings.jpg

211 ms

corescientific.com

corescientific.com

307 ms

Group-2264.jpg

Group-2264.jpg

208 ms

place-1.jpg

place-1.jpg

209 ms

place-4.jpg

place-4.jpg

209 ms

place-5.jpg

place-5.jpg

305 ms

place-3.jpg

place-3.jpg

305 ms

pecos.jpg

pecos.jpg

305 ms

DentonTexas.jpg

DentonTexas.jpg

306 ms

corescientific-footprint-place-austin2.webp

corescientific-footprint-place-austin2.webp

305 ms

Group-2265-1.jpg

Group-2265-1.jpg

353 ms

Rectangle-81643-1.jpg

Rectangle-81643-1.jpg

330 ms

Core_Scientific_Exterior-09-1-scaled.jpg

Core_Scientific_Exterior-09-1-scaled.jpg

331 ms

Rectangle-8155.jpg

Rectangle-8155.jpg

329 ms

Rectangle-8163-2.jpg

Rectangle-8163-2.jpg

355 ms

Rectangle-8163-3.jpg

Rectangle-8163-3.jpg

356 ms

Rectangle-8163-22.jpg

Rectangle-8163-22.jpg

356 ms

Rectangle-8163-26.jpg

Rectangle-8163-26.jpg

355 ms

FgAZOIBWIAc73lJ.jpeg

FgAZOIBWIAc73lJ.jpeg

357 ms

Rectangle-8163-3.jpg

Rectangle-8163-3.jpg

402 ms

corescientific-newsletter.png

corescientific-newsletter.png

415 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

379 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

363 ms

NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fRMQ.ttf

NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fRMQ.ttf

209 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCKIw.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCKIw.ttf

300 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDKIw.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDKIw.ttf

321 ms

Metropolis-Regular.ttf

Metropolis-Regular.ttf

378 ms

Metropolis-SemiBold.ttf

Metropolis-SemiBold.ttf

366 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

323 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

323 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

323 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

323 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

323 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

323 ms

453 ms

Metropolis-Bold.ttf

Metropolis-Bold.ttf

372 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

113 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

133 ms

Accessibility Review

corescientific.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

corescientific.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

corescientific.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corescientific.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corescientific.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

corescientific.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Core Scientific. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: