13.9 sec in total
954 ms
11.8 sec
1.1 sec
Visit coretamp.com now to see the best up-to-date Coretamp content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about coretamp.com
We are a packaging machine manufacturer specializing in VFFS and HFFS for over 15 years. Explore a Wide Range of High-Quality Packing Machines to Enhance Your Packaging Efficiency and Streamline Your ...
Visit coretamp.comWe analyzed Coretamp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 954 ms and then it took 12.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
coretamp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value1,580 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
954 ms
1346 ms
263 ms
402 ms
516 ms
Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Coretamp.com, 12% (15 requests) were made to Kht.zoosnet.net and 2% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Coretamp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 441.6 kB (9%)
5.1 MB
4.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Coretamp.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 142.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coretamp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 95.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 95.1 kB or 48% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coretamp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.5 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (39%)
124
76
The browser has sent 124 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coretamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
coretamp.com
954 ms
www.coretamp.com
1346 ms
index.css
263 ms
animate.css
402 ms
jquery.js
516 ms
wow.min.js
391 ms
index.js
422 ms
js
37 ms
sm.js
405 ms
classie.js
395 ms
uisearch.js
509 ms
jquery.SuperSlide.js
649 ms
lunbo2.js
732 ms
smbanner.js
646 ms
placeholder.js
616 ms
LsJS.aspx
1324 ms
gtm.js
147 ms
bat.js
203 ms
fbevents.js
203 ms
zhongwentb.png
200 ms
guoqi2.jpg
145 ms
guoqi3.jpg
195 ms
guoqi1.jpg
269 ms
logo.png
372 ms
5baf1393af2ff.jpg
592 ms
5b7e13d435047.jpg
561 ms
5f8974a9400bd.jpg
647 ms
5c26cd56b058c.jpg
593 ms
5f8974ffb0328.jpg
874 ms
5e7568a9470dc.jpg
1382 ms
m1li1.png
818 ms
m1li2.png
883 ms
m1li3.png
1023 ms
m1li4.png
978 ms
5e758908b7abd.jpg
1576 ms
5b3c9623bfe64.jpg
1033 ms
5c10ab6496fab.jpg
1522 ms
5b3db8331dd80.jpg
1303 ms
5bdfe425eff87.jpg
1576 ms
5c04eb5bd1280.jpg
1346 ms
5c272aca0241b.jpg
1777 ms
5be138614ae20.jpg
1850 ms
5be145f24b196.jpg
1948 ms
5b430c4e79090.jpg
2198 ms
5be3aef992ae7.jpg
2068 ms
5b6e440568492.jpg
2270 ms
5c6e637e1eef8.jpg
3063 ms
5b42fbf6c446a.jpg
2126 ms
5c2d9fad77d29.jpg
2475 ms
5b42feba1e566.jpg
2781 ms
5b7a2e60539d9.jpg
5240 ms
5b3dd04c6698a.jpg
2702 ms
analytics.js
129 ms
5b3dcdaf376b4.jpg
5194 ms
5b3dd0c9c0df2.jpg
3319 ms
5b90d6d8406ac.jpg
5130 ms
5b42f59684c82.jpg
4316 ms
5b42f6c6141dc.jpg
4065 ms
5b42f580b7882.jpg
4111 ms
conversion_async.js
73 ms
js
70 ms
187404941822021
125 ms
collect
70 ms
5b90dc3ccbf2f.jpg
5598 ms
126 ms
collect
73 ms
z_stat.php
1406 ms
FuturaStdBook.woff
4702 ms
56 ms
collect
88 ms
79 ms
ga-audiences
17 ms
FuturaStdHeavy.woff
4719 ms
5b83a3b3032b6.jpg
5129 ms
5b3dd18ff102b.jpg
5684 ms
5b42fce7117b0.jpg
5274 ms
5b7a45c6e9812.jpg
5387 ms
5b7a37f386626.jpg
5721 ms
5b5290a7a19e5.jpg
5753 ms
5b839d8c28be8.jpg
5467 ms
5b655a67691a6.jpg
5348 ms
5b83905b20458.jpg
5918 ms
5b8392ceb428e.jpg
5685 ms
m3-1.jpg
5393 ms
m3-2.jpg
5634 ms
m3-3.jpg
5538 ms
m3-4.jpg
5461 ms
m3-5.jpg
5744 ms
stat.htm
1290 ms
core.php
835 ms
m3-6.jpg
5575 ms
m4-1.jpg
5577 ms
5 ms
m4-2.jpg
5612 ms
m4-3.jpg
5747 ms
m4-4.jpg
5483 ms
m4-5.jpg
5534 ms
5d1af614daa11.jpg
5933 ms
5bc169969104f.jpg
5626 ms
9.gif
622 ms
pic.gif
1265 ms
JS5.css
229 ms
JS_Float.aspx
408 ms
ft-fb.png
5041 ms
ft-gg.png
5088 ms
offline_en3.gif
432 ms
7.gif
413 ms
newsid0.aspx
303 ms
close.png
288 ms
da1.png
326 ms
da.png
471 ms
jiantou.png
487 ms
minioffline160714.aspx
431 ms
ft-tw.png
4699 ms
minin_en.aspx
204 ms
mini160714JS.aspx
211 ms
lrchatzz.css
279 ms
notice.png
199 ms
ft-yt.png
3936 ms
ft-pin.png
3891 ms
ft-in.png
4069 ms
reanod.png
3374 ms
sousuo.png
3211 ms
circle.png
3206 ms
circleon.png
3202 ms
m2bg.jpg
3669 ms
m3bg.png
3032 ms
gotop.png
2867 ms
coretamp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
coretamp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
coretamp.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coretamp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Coretamp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coretamp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coretamp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: