Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 95% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

cormac.co.uk

Cormac Engineering Specialists in Supply and Installation

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

634 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

888 ms

cormac.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cormac.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Cormac best content right away, or after learning these important things about cormac.co.uk

Cormac Engineering is your industry expert, with over 25 years experience in project and plant supply, installation and commissioning

Visit cormac.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Cormac.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 634 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cormac.co.uk performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value33,890 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.178

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value48.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cormac.co.uk

634 ms

jquery.min.js

149 ms

js

148 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

152 ms

hooks.min.js

250 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Cormac.co.uk, 10% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (688 ms) belongs to the original domain Cormac.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 354.2 kB (54%)

Content Size

653.5 kB

After Optimization

299.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Cormac.co.uk main page is 653.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 408.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 346.2 kB

  • Original 408.1 kB
  • After minification 402.3 kB
  • After compression 61.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 346.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 225.4 kB
  • After minification 217.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cormac images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 63 B

  • Original 20.0 kB
  • After minification 20.0 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (35%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cormac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cormac.co.uk accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cormac.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

cormac.co.uk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cormac.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cormac.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cormac. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: