6.3 sec in total
324 ms
5.8 sec
206 ms
Click here to check amazing Costaclick content for Italy. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about costaclick.net
Visit costaclick.netWe analyzed Costaclick.net page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
costaclick.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value9.5 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value630 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.035
100/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
324 ms
409 ms
481 ms
428 ms
444 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Costaclick.net, 68% (75 requests) were made to Extra.costaclick.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Extra.costaclick.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (61%)
3.8 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Costaclick.net main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Costaclick images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 418.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Costaclick.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 418.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 90 (87%)
104
14
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Costaclick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 48 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
costaclick.net
324 ms
www.costaclick.net
409 ms
481 ms
default.aspx
428 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
444 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
homepageNew.css
308 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
14 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
32 ms
placeholderNew.js
333 ms
init.js
481 ms
ScriptResource.axd
313 ms
blank.js
498 ms
ScriptResource.axd
310 ms
WebResource.axd
325 ms
common.js
311 ms
autohide.js
317 ms
RadAjaxNamespace.js
335 ms
RadAjax.js
334 ms
CookiesPolicy.js
252 ms
logo-extra.jpg
7 ms
costa-mobile.png
175 ms
wave-top.jpg
161 ms
news-loginpage
818 ms
celestesansot.woff
264 ms
wave_footer.jpg
217 ms
logoCostaCrociere.png
320 ms
ga.js
29 ms
CookiesPolicy.css
212 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
bg4.jpg
721 ms
initstrings.js
206 ms
strings.js
237 ms
core.js
350 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
119 ms
style.css
234 ms
bootstrap.min.css
438 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
332 ms
chosen.min.css
334 ms
demo_table.css
336 ms
demo_page.css
346 ms
dataTables.css
347 ms
dataTables.tableTools.css
447 ms
zoo.css
447 ms
widgetkit-237ab660.css
563 ms
console.log.js
457 ms
jquery.min.js
702 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
767 ms
jquery.tablesorter.min.js
548 ms
jquery.tablesorter.pager.js
549 ms
bootstrap.min.js
575 ms
jwplayer.js
659 ms
highcharts.js
897 ms
exporting.js
672 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
686 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
771 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
1173 ms
dataTables.tableTools.js
802 ms
jquery.js
941 ms
responsive.js
871 ms
default.js
879 ms
widgetkit-d1015ecf.js
916 ms
base.css
976 ms
layout.css
987 ms
menus.css
1004 ms
modules.css
1030 ms
tools.css
1056 ms
system.css
1081 ms
extensions.css
1094 ms
custom.css
1114 ms
custom2.css
1043 ms
YanoneKaffeesatz.css
956 ms
turquoise.css
871 ms
opensans.css
883 ms
opensans.css
905 ms
droidsans.css
930 ms
style.css
944 ms
responsive.css
855 ms
print.css
859 ms
opensans.css
875 ms
droidsans.css
892 ms
item.css
838 ms
warp.js
929 ms
responsive.js
906 ms
accordionmenu.js
902 ms
dropdownmenu.js
820 ms
template.js
807 ms
jquery.table.filter.min.js
930 ms
extra.js
816 ms
lightbox.js
116 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
123 ms
spotlight.js
111 ms
sidebarv2.js
256 ms
base.css
113 ms
layout.css
160 ms
menus.css
218 ms
modules.css
220 ms
tools.css
215 ms
system.css
236 ms
custom.css
266 ms
css
58 ms
responsive.css
265 ms
print.css
316 ms
menus.css
111 ms
system.css
113 ms
system.css
118 ms
system-all.css
146 ms
responsive.css
113 ms
Primavera_piu_new_6f75e2af77da3cd69cfb690cf8221ee4.png
1034 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
113 ms
nr-632.min.js
42 ms
costaclick.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
costaclick.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
costaclick.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Costaclick.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Costaclick.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
costaclick.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Costaclick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: