6.3 sec in total
120 ms
5.8 sec
382 ms
Visit costcare.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Cost Care content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about costcare.co.uk
Visit costcare.co.ukWe analyzed Costcare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
costcare.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.8 s
6/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.117
85/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
120 ms
101 ms
316 ms
319 ms
322 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Costcare.co.uk, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Costcare.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 119.7 kB (25%)
474.7 kB
355.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Costcare.co.uk main page is 474.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 325.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Costcare.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (82%)
39
7
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cost Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.costcare.co.uk
120 ms
css2
101 ms
styles.css
316 ms
style.css
319 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
322 ms
foundation.css
403 ms
custom.css
418 ms
style.css
320 ms
jquery.min.js
710 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
635 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
636 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
628 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
846 ms
index.js
775 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
942 ms
core.min.js
943 ms
menu.min.js
945 ms
selectmenu.min.js
1026 ms
foundation.min.js
1110 ms
slick.min.js
1215 ms
lazyload.min.js
1246 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
1256 ms
jquery.fancybox.v3.js
1336 ms
global.js
1028 ms
js
68 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1343 ms
hooks.min.js
1423 ms
i18n.min.js
1536 ms
a11y.min.js
1558 ms
jquery.json.min.js
1569 ms
gravityforms.min.js
1786 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
1784 ms
utils.min.js
1786 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
1848 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
1876 ms
phone.svg
1157 ms
envelope.svg
1371 ms
link-arrow.svg
1337 ms
slider-arrow.svg
1344 ms
font
68 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1498 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1609 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1459 ms
ajax-loader.gif
487 ms
costcare.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
costcare.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
costcare.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Costcare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Costcare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
costcare.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cost Care. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: