Tools & Wizards About Us
costcare.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    28% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

costcare.co.uk

Cost Care Tax – R&D Tax Credit and Capital Allowances Specialists – Trusted R&D Tax Relief and Capital Allowances services since 1995

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

153 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

519 ms

costcare.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit costcare.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Cost Care content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about costcare.co.uk

Visit costcare.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Costcare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

costcare.co.uk performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value37.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,670 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.5 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.costcare.co.uk

153 ms

css2

178 ms

js

404 ms

styles.css

50 ms

style.css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Costcare.co.uk, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (426 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 532.3 kB (77%)

Content Size

688.8 kB

After Optimization

156.5 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Costcare.co.uk main page is 688.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 352.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 66.9 kB

  • Original 82.7 kB
  • After minification 73.9 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 161.7 kB

  • Original 254.1 kB
  • After minification 250.9 kB
  • After compression 92.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 161.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 303.8 kB

  • Original 352.0 kB
  • After minification 349.2 kB
  • After compression 48.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Costcare.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 303.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (82%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cost Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.costcare.co.uk

www.costcare.co.uk

153 ms

css2

css2

178 ms

js

js

404 ms

styles.css

styles.css

50 ms

style.css

style.css

75 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

75 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

141 ms

custom.css

custom.css

137 ms

style.css

style.css

74 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

82 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

140 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

103 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

98 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

121 ms

index.js

index.js

133 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

134 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

134 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

135 ms

selectmenu.min.js

selectmenu.min.js

136 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

138 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

136 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

162 ms

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

137 ms

jquery.fancybox.v3.js

jquery.fancybox.v3.js

139 ms

global.js

global.js

139 ms

js

js

391 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

139 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

159 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

152 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

152 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

152 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

158 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

143 ms

phone.svg

phone.svg

75 ms

envelope.svg

envelope.svg

99 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCM.woff

182 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCM.woff

360 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCM.woff

424 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCM.woff

426 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCM.woff

425 ms

link-arrow.svg

link-arrow.svg

129 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

386 ms

slider-arrow.svg

slider-arrow.svg

244 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

233 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

70 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

69 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

83 ms

gen_204

gen_204

28 ms

Accessibility Review

costcare.co.uk accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best Practices

costcare.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

costcare.co.uk SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Costcare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Costcare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

costcare.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cost Care. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: