2.9 sec in total
298 ms
2.2 sec
416 ms
Visit cover.net now to see the best up-to-date Cover content for Gibraltar and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cover.net
MGA Software, Insurance Software, Claims Management Software Award winning UK Based Insurance Software provider Digital Solutions for Insurance
Visit cover.netWe analyzed Cover.net page load time and found that the first response time was 298 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
cover.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value4.2 s
44/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
44/100
10%
298 ms
330 ms
70 ms
107 ms
140 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Cover.net, 14% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cover.net.
Page size can be reduced by 75.0 kB (1%)
5.5 MB
5.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Cover.net main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cover images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cover.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (32%)
28
19
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
cover.net
298 ms
www.cover.net
330 ms
gtm.js
70 ms
uc.js
107 ms
js
140 ms
782464.js
34 ms
css2
39 ms
site.min.css
169 ms
site.min.js
351 ms
js
79 ms
js
76 ms
hotjar-1865419.js
182 ms
brand-logo-red.png
195 ms
pattern-left-white.svg
236 ms
pattern-right-white.svg
243 ms
arrow.svg
302 ms
product-and-solutions.jpg
497 ms
home-4.jpg
591 ms
overlay.png
392 ms
home-carousel.jpg
714 ms
full-team.jpg
1207 ms
home-2.jpg
542 ms
linkedin-icon.png
462 ms
invest-in-people-2022.png
536 ms
ISO-logos.png
568 ms
diversity-bronze.png
938 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf
22 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf
31 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
66 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
65 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf
66 ms
modules.404c8789d11e259a4872.js
18 ms
ajax-loader.gif
378 ms
slick.woff
398 ms
analytics.js
21 ms
iso-logos.png
95 ms
collect
4 ms
cover.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
cover.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cover.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cover.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cover.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cover.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cover. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: