Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

487 ms

crayonpaper.com screenshot

About Website

Visit crayonpaper.com now to see the best up-to-date Crayonpaper content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about crayonpaper.com

CrayonPaper - One stop destination for freaks! Join us here for all tips and hacks related to android, chrome and based OEM's. - CrayonPaper

Visit crayonpaper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Crayonpaper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

crayonpaper.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

crayonpaper.com

1692 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

175 ms

styles.css

174 ms

settings.css

169 ms

css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Crayonpaper.com, 16% (11 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 15% (10 requests) were made to I2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (79%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

632.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Crayonpaper.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 132.4 kB

  • Original 151.7 kB
  • After minification 140.4 kB
  • After compression 19.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 206.3 kB
  • After minification 192.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Crayonpaper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 793.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 854.4 kB
  • After compression 272.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 793.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 148.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Crayonpaper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (57%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crayonpaper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

crayonpaper.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

crayonpaper.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

crayonpaper.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Crayonpaper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Crayonpaper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Crayonpaper. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: