3.7 sec in total
267 ms
2.6 sec
762 ms
Visit cricketer.com now to see the best up-to-date Cricketer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cricketer.com
TheCricketer.com is the No.1 Cricket News and Cricket Scores website. Home of The Cricketer Magazine The Cricketer Village Cup
Visit cricketer.comWe analyzed Cricketer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
cricketer.com performance score
267 ms
449 ms
94 ms
212 ms
183 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cricketer.com, 59% (55 requests) were made to Thecricketer.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Cdn.jotfor.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Thecricketer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 923.0 kB (20%)
4.7 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Cricketer.com main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 181.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cricketer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 493.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 493.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 202.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cricketer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (46%)
91
49
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cricketer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cricketer.com
267 ms
Home.aspx
449 ms
viewport.js
94 ms
LIVE_WL_Site.css
212 ms
live_WL_Topics.css
183 ms
live_import.css
195 ms
isotope.js
487 ms
masonry-docs_min.js
225 ms
masonry.js
249 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
bootstrap.min.js
29 ms
WebResource.axd
358 ms
WebResource.axd
292 ms
WebResource.axd
307 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
455 ms
70192152877359
461 ms
72344093880358
464 ms
bootstrap.min.css
7 ms
blog-post.css
158 ms
master.css
219 ms
hero.css
263 ms
masonry.css
277 ms
nohover.css
296 ms
carousel.css
330 ms
theteam.css
361 ms
priceTable.css
385 ms
tabScores.css
394 ms
carouselFix.css
394 ms
css
15 ms
ga.js
4 ms
TheCricketerMagazine.png
129 ms
__utm.gif
33 ms
__utm.gif
32 ms
MPU_KeithProwse_v3_jpg.jpg
296 ms
43205_1.jpg
535 ms
pointerUp.png
216 ms
43204_1.jpg
452 ms
43202_1.jpg
336 ms
43206_1.jpg
292 ms
43200_1.jpg
704 ms
43198_1.jpg
444 ms
43201_1.jpg
501 ms
43191_1.jpg
479 ms
43157_1.jpg
596 ms
43194_1.jpg
633 ms
43195_1.jpg
655 ms
43193_1.jpg
682 ms
43197_1.jpg
775 ms
Gifts-Flash%5B1%5D.gif
707 ms
Willis_EventMPU.jpg
739 ms
bowling-master-MPU.png
765 ms
GM-Static-MPU-300x250-BD.gif
782 ms
SubsCarousel44.jpg
992 ms
image001.png
873 ms
ts2_CricketWeek_MPU_V3.gif
855 ms
SubsCarouselSummer2.jpg
946 ms
ARTICLES-5.jpg
884 ms
ARTICLES-2.jpg
970 ms
ARTICLES-7.jpg
973 ms
ARTICLES-8.jpg
986 ms
ARTICLES-11.jpg
992 ms
ARTICLES-9.jpg
1045 ms
TCLxsmall.gif
1049 ms
Include_LiveScores.aspx
1045 ms
formCss.css
211 ms
nova.css
234 ms
566a91c2977cdfcd478b4567.css
244 ms
form-submit-button-light.css
234 ms
prototype.forms.js
252 ms
jotform.forms.js
282 ms
form-submit-button-simple_white.css
242 ms
widgets.js
24 ms
talksport2-300.html
180 ms
sdk.js
18 ms
carouselArrow.jpg
1033 ms
timeline.bc7ee675e57cb01f4d1e255156414e73.js
26 ms
132 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
64 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
88 ms
syndication
123 ms
345516087900770305
129 ms
talkSPORT2_stacked.svg
299 ms
SpriteSheet.svg
157 ms
hKNLmcth
32 ms
d9dsZAAw
32 ms
TCR28o56
31 ms
timeline.b6ca5fbe9fc709c1f1b8c6e02c82d896.light.ltr.css
15 ms
timeline.b6ca5fbe9fc709c1f1b8c6e02c82d896.light.ltr.css
18 ms
Gotham-Medium.otf
403 ms
mfaMNVv2_normal.jpg
5 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_82bf0e17151661577a10f7dd1e3e30dea8e59ed9.css
40 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_82bf0e17151661577a10f7dd1e3e30dea8e59ed9.css
44 ms
printForm.css
33 ms
jot.html
2 ms
cricketer.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cricketer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Cricketer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cricketer.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cricketer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: