Tools & Wizards About Us
critiquemymanuscript.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

critiquemymanuscript.com

Critique Your Manuscript | Critique My Manuscript | Quality critique services for your manuscript, novel, book, or proposal

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

605 ms

critiquemymanuscript.com screenshot

About Website

Visit critiquemymanuscript.com now to see the best up-to-date Critique My Manuscript content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about critiquemymanuscript.com

Introduction to critique services. Hire our critique services if you need a manuscript critiqued. We offer manuscript, synopsis, proposal critiques.

Visit critiquemymanuscript.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Critiquemymanuscript.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

critiquemymanuscript.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

critiquemymanuscript.com

181 ms

www.critiquemymanuscript.com

425 ms

style.css

71 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

141 ms

testimonials-widget.css

213 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Critiquemymanuscript.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Livewritethrive.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) relates to the external source Livewritethrive.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 62.6 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Critiquemymanuscript.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 986.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 68.2 kB
  • After minification 66.9 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 986.6 kB
  • After minification 983.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Critique My Manuscript images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 379.6 kB
  • After minification 379.6 kB
  • After compression 376.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 87.6 kB
  • After minification 87.2 kB
  • After compression 82.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Critiquemymanuscript.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (63%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Critique My Manuscript. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

critiquemymanuscript.com

critiquemymanuscript.com

181 ms

www.critiquemymanuscript.com

www.critiquemymanuscript.com

425 ms

style.css

style.css

71 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

141 ms

testimonials-widget.css

testimonials-widget.css

213 ms

testimonials-widget-premium.css

testimonials-widget-premium.css

213 ms

testimonials-widget-premium-form.css

testimonials-widget-premium-form.css

214 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

290 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

19 ms

form.min.css

form.min.css

220 ms

style.css

style.css

223 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

357 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

293 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

293 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

296 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

298 ms

form.min.js

form.min.js

360 ms

general.js

general.js

361 ms

css3.css

css3.css

363 ms

custom.css

custom.css

368 ms

standard.min.js

standard.min.js

368 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

429 ms

wp-api.js

wp-api.js

432 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

431 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

432 ms

jquery.raty.min.js

jquery.raty.min.js

439 ms

reset.css

reset.css

219 ms

css

css

32 ms

CMM_header.jpg

CMM_header.jpg

259 ms

ebook.png

ebook.png

941 ms

The-12-Key-Pillars-of-Novel-Construction-ebook-cover-small2.jpg

The-12-Key-Pillars-of-Novel-Construction-ebook-cover-small2.jpg

770 ms

Fatal-Flaws-ebook-cover.jpg

Fatal-Flaws-ebook-cover.jpg

657 ms

livewritethrive1.png

livewritethrive1.png

658 ms

Say-What-front-cover.jpg

Say-What-front-cover.jpg

952 ms

Heart_of_Your_Story_ebook-cover.jpg

Heart_of_Your_Story_ebook-cover.jpg

959 ms

rss_32.png

rss_32.png

88 ms

twitter_32.png

twitter_32.png

88 ms

facebook_32.png

facebook_32.png

87 ms

linkedin_32.png

linkedin_32.png

88 ms

scolding-171x300.jpg

scolding-171x300.jpg

87 ms

thumbs-up-300x271.jpg

thumbs-up-300x271.jpg

256 ms

cat-stretch-201x300.jpg

cat-stretch-201x300.jpg

189 ms

all.js

all.js

65 ms

IdA-xfbUras

IdA-xfbUras

191 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

62 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

102 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

102 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

129 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

129 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf

132 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

141 ms

all.js

all.js

13 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

109 ms

controls.png

controls.png

109 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

14 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

38 ms

base.js

base.js

64 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

265 ms

jDVVIT4ZwDHfBiET8TcWj790JrYgF6qU1g_sOcBWI_w.js

jDVVIT4ZwDHfBiET8TcWj790JrYgF6qU1g_sOcBWI_w.js

97 ms

embed.js

embed.js

54 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

21 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

18 ms

Create

Create

22 ms

id

id

14 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

15 ms

Accessibility Review

critiquemymanuscript.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

critiquemymanuscript.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

critiquemymanuscript.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Critiquemymanuscript.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Critiquemymanuscript.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

critiquemymanuscript.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Critique My Manuscript. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: