Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

crms.org

Colorado Rocky Mountain School | Mountain Preparatory School

Page Load Speed

11.2 sec in total

First Response

195 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

5.4 sec

crms.org screenshot

About Website

Visit crms.org now to see the best up-to-date Crms content for Switzerland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about crms.org

Welcome to Colorado Rocky Mountain School. Take a peek into our courses and educational experiences of our boarding school.

Visit crms.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Crms.org page load time and found that the first response time was 195 ms and then it took 11 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

crms.org performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value29.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,710 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

crms.org

195 ms

www.crms.org

2888 ms

common-skeleton.min.css

70 ms

tooltip.min.css

139 ms

style.min.css

211 ms

Our browser made a total of 156 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (113 requests) were addressed to the original Crms.org, 6% (10 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Crms.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 254.2 kB (3%)

Content Size

8.9 MB

After Optimization

8.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Crms.org main page is 8.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 137.3 kB

  • Original 163.3 kB
  • After minification 156.2 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 105.1 kB

  • Original 8.4 MB
  • After minification 8.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Crms images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 167.6 kB
  • After minification 167.6 kB
  • After compression 163.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 142.4 kB
  • After minification 142.4 kB
  • After compression 135.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Crms.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (60%)

Requests Now

125

After Optimization

50

The browser has sent 125 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crms. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

crms.org accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

crms.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

crms.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Crms.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Crms.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Crms. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: