17.2 sec in total
949 ms
15 sec
1.3 sec
Visit cromatica.in now to see the best up-to-date Cromatica content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cromatica.in
Explore the wide range of Stainless Steel Interiors for your homes & commercial use. Contact us to get your steel interiors customized by the best!
Visit cromatica.inWe analyzed Cromatica.in page load time and found that the first response time was 949 ms and then it took 16.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
cromatica.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value11.6 s
0/100
25%
Value17.5 s
0/100
10%
Value2,200 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.043
99/100
15%
Value29.5 s
0/100
10%
949 ms
2676 ms
446 ms
889 ms
959 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Cromatica.in, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6 sec) belongs to the original domain Cromatica.in.
Page size can be reduced by 616.9 kB (28%)
2.2 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Cromatica.in main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 241.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 241.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 364.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cromatica needs image optimization as it can save up to 364.0 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cromatica.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (61%)
76
30
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cromatica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cromatica.in
949 ms
www.cromatica.in
2676 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
446 ms
main.min.css
889 ms
menu-animation.min.css
959 ms
style.min.css
1326 ms
styles.css
1320 ms
contact-form-7-main.min.css
1420 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
1273 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
1471 ms
general.min.css
1568 ms
eael-6.css
1596 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1808 ms
swiper.min.css
1763 ms
post-8.css
1902 ms
post-6.css
1960 ms
frontend.css
2066 ms
css
29 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1920 ms
mystickyelements-front.min.css
2192 ms
intlTelInput.css
2305 ms
css
43 ms
fontawesome.min.css
2386 ms
solid.min.css
2254 ms
regular.min.css
2453 ms
jquery.min.js
2595 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2633 ms
js
59 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
2587 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
2870 ms
all.min.css
3281 ms
v4-shims.min.css
2941 ms
post-2554.css
2937 ms
animations.min.css
3108 ms
brands.min.css
3082 ms
frontend.min.js
3277 ms
index.js
3327 ms
index.js
3437 ms
general.min.js
3581 ms
eael-6.js
3635 ms
intlTelInput.js
3754 ms
jquery.cookie.js
3255 ms
mystickyelements-fronted.min.js
2755 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
2979 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
2798 ms
waypoints.min.js
2637 ms
core.min.js
2839 ms
frontend.min.js
3225 ms
Cromatica-White-Logo-200x55.png
1604 ms
Cromatica-Icons-150x150.png
2280 ms
Cromatica-Icons-1-150x150.png
1588 ms
Cromatica-Icons-2-150x150.png
1918 ms
Cromatica-Icons-4-150x150.png
2181 ms
timesbusinessawardCromatica.png
3147 ms
2.png
4118 ms
5.png
3957 ms
4.png
5267 ms
1.png
4687 ms
3.png
5607 ms
hafele-150x150.jpg
3489 ms
Hettich1-150x150.jpg
3800 ms
saint-gobain-150x150.jpg
4126 ms
loox5-150x150.jpg
4497 ms
Godrej-150x150.jpg
4596 ms
ebco-150x150.jpg
4355 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
js
78 ms
collect
71 ms
Neo-Sans-Std-Regular.otf
4483 ms
Neo-Sans-Std-Light.otf
5167 ms
Neo-Sans-Std-Bold.otf
5264 ms
Myriad-Pro-Regular.ttf
5265 ms
Myriad-Pro-Light.otf
4515 ms
Myriad-Pro-Bold.ttf
4905 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
5559 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
5815 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
5032 ms
eicons.woff
5614 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
5611 ms
KAFF-150x150.jpg
6039 ms
kessebohmer-150x150.jpg
5075 ms
Weber-150x150.jpg
5304 ms
Whirlpool-150x150.jpg
5411 ms
blum-150x150.jpg
5424 ms
aristo-150x150.jpg
5618 ms
elica-150x150.jpg
5528 ms
Siemens-150x150.jpg
5470 ms
black-steel-bg.jpg
5548 ms
2b50.svg
145 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf
19 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyI.ttf
60 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf
61 ms
cromatica.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
cromatica.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
cromatica.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cromatica.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cromatica.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cromatica.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cromatica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: