10.5 sec in total
1.5 sec
8.5 sec
506 ms
Welcome to crushingandscreeningplant.com homepage info - get ready to check Crushingandscreeningplant best content right away, or after learning these important things about crushingandscreeningplant.com
Crushing And Screening Plant Turkey
Visit crushingandscreeningplant.comWe analyzed Crushingandscreeningplant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
crushingandscreeningplant.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.9 s
0/100
10%
Value18.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
1473 ms
337 ms
338 ms
357 ms
342 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Crushingandscreeningplant.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Images.dmca.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Crushingandscreeningplant.com.
Page size can be reduced by 526.7 kB (28%)
1.9 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Crushingandscreeningplant.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Crushingandscreeningplant images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 251.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 251.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 220.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Crushingandscreeningplant.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 220.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (73%)
78
21
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crushingandscreeningplant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
crushingandscreeningplant.com
1473 ms
wppg-photo.css
337 ms
prettyPhoto.css
338 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
357 ms
style.css
342 ms
prettyPhoto.css
360 ms
owl.carousel.css
376 ms
owl.theme.css
629 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
626 ms
responsive.css
631 ms
images.css
637 ms
style-colors.php
993 ms
style.php
1004 ms
raleway.css
922 ms
css
31 ms
woocommerce.css
932 ms
jquery.js
1093 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
934 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.js
1254 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1241 ms
video-lightbox.js
1236 ms
custom.css
1286 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
1303 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
1383 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
1535 ms
jquery.ui.sortable.min.js
1541 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.min.js
1587 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.min.js
1597 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1618 ms
jquery.swiper.min.js
1677 ms
jquery.plugins.js
1985 ms
mfn.menu.js
1836 ms
scripts.js
1881 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1897 ms
base.css
1632 ms
animate.min.css
1669 ms
buttons.css
1846 ms
fonts.css
1859 ms
isotope.css
1880 ms
grid.css
1922 ms
layout.css
1982 ms
shortcodes.css
1992 ms
variables.css
2119 ms
jquery.ui.base.css
1884 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
1895 ms
fontawesome.css
380 ms
socialico.css
431 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
158 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.css
300 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.css
306 ms
dmca_protected_sml_120b.png
54 ms
header_shadow.png
188 ms
pattern_slashes_10.png
317 ms
ico_search.png
324 ms
pattern_form.png
344 ms
pattern_slashes_6.png
324 ms
Logomuz.png
353 ms
bauma-kucuk2.png
694 ms
pattern_slashes_3.png
658 ms
menu_shadow.png
663 ms
bauma-2016-eng.png
2152 ms
165.machenery-eng.jpg
2748 ms
divider.png
756 ms
dragon-7.jpg
1268 ms
arrow_right.png
1055 ms
Dragon-2ING.jpg
1325 ms
Dragon-10-Kazakistan-almaata-2-tr11.jpg
1347 ms
Seyyar-K%C4%B1rma-Eleme-Tesisi-Dragon-201.jpg
2758 ms
DRAGON-15-SDFSD-1.jpg
2689 ms
dragon-45-en-02.jpg
1892 ms
Dragon-6073-1.jpg
1869 ms
Dragon-609-ing-1.jpg
2386 ms
dragon-617.jpg
2398 ms
dragon-11.000-3c-en.jpg
4157 ms
turbo-950-mobil-konkasor-tesisi-1420557811.jpg
2904 ms
Turbo-900-Mobile-Curshing-And-Screening-Plant.jpg
2913 ms
widget.png
3036 ms
back_to_top.png
3187 ms
back_to_top_arrow.png
3196 ms
watch.js
2 ms
raleway-regular-webfont.woff
3370 ms
raleway-light-webfont.woff
3393 ms
raleway-thin-webfont.woff
3515 ms
raleway-bold-webfont.woff
3693 ms
crushingandscreeningplant.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
crushingandscreeningplant.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
crushingandscreeningplant.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
TR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Crushingandscreeningplant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Turkish language. Our system also found out that Crushingandscreeningplant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
crushingandscreeningplant.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Crushingandscreeningplant. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: