8.9 sec in total
2.7 sec
5.8 sec
484 ms
Click here to check amazing Cssclip content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cssclip.com
CSSclip | web design inspiration and gallery
Visit cssclip.comWe analyzed Cssclip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
cssclip.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value920 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.305
39/100
15%
Value8.9 s
35/100
10%
2657 ms
319 ms
345 ms
347 ms
367 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Cssclip.com, 25% (13 requests) were made to Cssclip.xvs.jp and 11% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Cssclip.com.
Page size can be reduced by 495.8 kB (41%)
1.2 MB
700.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Cssclip.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 581.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 338.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 338.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cssclip images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 95.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 95.4 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cssclip.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (44%)
52
29
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cssclip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cssclip.com
2657 ms
reset.css
319 ms
default.css
345 ms
class.css
347 ms
layout.css
367 ms
font.css
368 ms
widjet.css
532 ms
style.css
661 ms
ie.css
677 ms
farbtastic.css
684 ms
pagenavi-css.css
684 ms
jquery.js
905 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
903 ms
dropdown.js
998 ms
functions.js
1024 ms
farbtastic.js
1044 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
1045 ms
functions.js
1274 ms
show_ads.js
6 ms
ikkaku10.com.w300.jpg
903 ms
mariecatribs.com.w300.jpg
770 ms
uponafold.com.au.w300.jpg
638 ms
www.image-festival.com.w300.jpg
769 ms
www.putzengel.at.w300.jpg
769 ms
melonfree.com.w300.jpg
1139 ms
smartphood.it.w300.jpg
918 ms
www.eynsfordmusicfestival.co.uk.w300.jpg
1377 ms
www.amazeelabs.com.w300.jpg
1270 ms
www.kinderfotografie-evihermans.be.w300.jpg
1655 ms
www.kiliwatch.fr.w300.jpg
1409 ms
izumimassage.com.au.w300.jpg
1243 ms
undertheweather.eu.w300.jpg
1820 ms
ca-pub-7798462459246109.js
216 ms
zrt_lookup.html
244 ms
show_ads_impl.js
200 ms
ga.js
195 ms
wheel.png
433 ms
mask.png
400 ms
marker.png
403 ms
ads
175 ms
osd.js
33 ms
__utm.gif
40 ms
ads
270 ms
ads
279 ms
m_js_controller.js
35 ms
abg.js
58 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
185 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
127 ms
s
105 ms
x_button_blue2.png
85 ms
11794837708166511396
51 ms
6651383775122092565
52 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
3 ms
cssclip.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cssclip.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cssclip.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JP
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cssclip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cssclip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cssclip.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cssclip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: