31.2 sec in total
1.5 sec
8.9 sec
20.8 sec
Welcome to cura.com homepage info - get ready to check Cura best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about cura.com
Cura virtual health care assistant for employers and hospitals. Remote patient monitoring platform to drive ZERO unexpected health events.
Visit cura.comWe analyzed Cura.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 29.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
cura.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.8 s
0/100
10%
Value13.0 s
0/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value2,450 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.104
89/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
1546 ms
318 ms
396 ms
395 ms
539 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Cura.com, 20% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Cura.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (11%)
10.7 MB
9.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Cura.com main page is 10.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 10.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cura images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 932 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cura.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (69%)
55
17
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cura. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cura.com
1546 ms
style.css
318 ms
cursor.css
396 ms
styles.css
395 ms
main.css
539 ms
uaf.css
542 ms
dashicons.min.css
599 ms
css
312 ms
css
361 ms
pum-site-styles.css
531 ms
style-static.min.css
746 ms
jquery.min.js
611 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
674 ms
adscript.js
673 ms
twilio-flex-webchat.min.js
680 ms
front.js
674 ms
js
449 ms
widget.js
527 ms
et-core-unified-tb-1227-882.min.css
679 ms
et-core-unified-882.min.css
688 ms
et-core-unified-tb-1227-deferred-882.min.css
739 ms
dtgsnonce.js
651 ms
typed.js
651 ms
typed.fe.js
653 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
2387 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2388 ms
index.js
2388 ms
scripts.min.js
2412 ms
core.min.js
2388 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
2390 ms
common.js
2391 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
2392 ms
maxmegamenu.js
2390 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2391 ms
css
114 ms
vm.js
1873 ms
wpads.coduplabs.com
2555 ms
vm.js
169 ms
fbevents.js
1005 ms
Cura-Logo-No-Tagline@3x.png
952 ms
herooption@3x.png
2440 ms
Employers@3x.png
1464 ms
Facilities@3x.png
2454 ms
Provider-Remote-Assessments@3x.png
2402 ms
phone-with-doc@3x-1.png
3425 ms
ONEDOCTOR@3x.png
1325 ms
MORETHANONE@3x.png
1462 ms
MEMBERSHIP@3x.png
2237 ms
joint-commission@3x-1.svg
2457 ms
Cura-Logo-Three-Color-Horizontal-white@3x-2.png
3398 ms
joint-commission@3x.svg
2944 ms
GOOGLE-PLAY-SMALL@3x.png
2743 ms
APPLE-APP-STORE@3x.png
2744 ms
js
562 ms
analytics.js
553 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
629 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
630 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
1402 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
1416 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
1416 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf
1423 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
1439 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf
1438 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf
1580 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
1579 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf
1579 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf
1580 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
1590 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf
1589 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf
1592 ms
modules.ttf
1906 ms
identity.js
473 ms
165400982031500
629 ms
collect
231 ms
cura.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cura.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
cura.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cura.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cura.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cura.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cura. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: