Tools & Wizards About Us
custom-ring.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

custom-ring.net

Page Load Speed

16.1 sec in total

First Response

498 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

10.3 sec

custom-ring.net screenshot

About Website

Visit custom-ring.net now to see the best up-to-date Custom Ring content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about custom-ring.net

Visit custom-ring.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Custom-ring.net page load time and found that the first response time was 498 ms and then it took 15.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

custom-ring.net performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value14,300 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

custom-ring.net

498 ms

custom-ring.net

900 ms

css

82 ms

font-awesome.min.css

142 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

279 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Custom-ring.net, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Custom-ring.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.7 MB (86%)

Content Size

5.5 MB

After Optimization

773.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Custom-ring.net main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 204.1 kB

  • Original 223.1 kB
  • After minification 104.5 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 118.7 kB, which is 53% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 204.1 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 4.4 MB

  • Original 4.9 MB
  • After minification 483.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Custom Ring needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.4 MB or 90% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 73.1 kB

  • Original 244.0 kB
  • After minification 244.0 kB
  • After compression 170.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 73.1 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 137.6 kB
  • After minification 137.6 kB
  • After compression 100.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Custom-ring.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.6 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (72%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Custom Ring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

custom-ring.net

custom-ring.net

498 ms

custom-ring.net

custom-ring.net

900 ms

css

css

82 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

142 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

279 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

417 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

421 ms

so_megamenu.css

so_megamenu.css

426 ms

so-categories.css

so-categories.css

430 ms

so-listing-tabs.css

so-listing-tabs.css

422 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

562 ms

lib.css

lib.css

553 ms

home2.css

home2.css

703 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

583 ms

pobol.css

pobol.css

802 ms

mfb.css

mfb.css

579 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

683 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

1435 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1444 ms

scale.css

scale.css

1437 ms

amsify.select.css

amsify.select.css

1466 ms

slick.css

slick.css

1468 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

1478 ms

pobol_tm.css

pobol_tm.css

1483 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

1633 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1481 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1619 ms

libs.js

libs.js

1642 ms

jquery.unveil.js

jquery.unveil.js

1632 ms

jquery.countdown.min.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

1659 ms

jquery.dcjqaccordion.2.8.min.js

jquery.dcjqaccordion.2.8.min.js

1659 ms

moment.js

moment.js

1709 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

1707 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

1707 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

1700 ms

application.js

application.js

2592 ms

homepage.js

homepage.js

2593 ms

so_megamenu.js

so_megamenu.js

2592 ms

pbl_odeme.css

pbl_odeme.css

2576 ms

jquery.autocomplete.min.js

jquery.autocomplete.min.js

2493 ms

jquery.lazy.min.js

jquery.lazy.min.js

2357 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

2340 ms

notify.js

notify.js

2340 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

2335 ms

jquery.amsifyselect.js

jquery.amsifyselect.js

2323 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

2316 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

1309 ms

en.jpg

en.jpg

1510 ms

tr.jpg

tr.jpg

1588 ms

wAn9RFt7TQde.png

wAn9RFt7TQde.png

1588 ms

Bq3kerxsGjNv.png

Bq3kerxsGjNv.png

1589 ms

rVuC0hEGsOIY.jpg

rVuC0hEGsOIY.jpg

2201 ms

rIDzo5XK2ACh.png

rIDzo5XK2ACh.png

2404 ms

XI6CB0HwJGbe.png

XI6CB0HwJGbe.png

2162 ms

316ThNMyuoWG.png

316ThNMyuoWG.png

2035 ms

C1V8zGdUpDJr.png

C1V8zGdUpDJr.png

2041 ms

FZtrTEfeYqiw.png

FZtrTEfeYqiw.png

1957 ms

Af8JPRT6p2re.png

Af8JPRT6p2re.png

1963 ms

Bde0iygQ7cSR.png

Bde0iygQ7cSR.png

2037 ms

3WMY5riS4jtL.png

3WMY5riS4jtL.png

2038 ms

Sa7hXiWtuwY8.png

Sa7hXiWtuwY8.png

2012 ms

Captcha

Captcha

2134 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJned3FHGPc.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJned3FHGPc.ttf

963 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEN2JQEk.ttf

1065 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEN2JQEk.ttf

1091 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2091 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

913 ms

Accessibility Review

custom-ring.net accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

custom-ring.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

custom-ring.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Custom-ring.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Custom-ring.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

custom-ring.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Custom Ring. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: