3.9 sec in total
898 ms
2.7 sec
288 ms
Welcome to cut-e.de homepage info - get ready to check Cut E best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about cut-e.de
Die Tests von Aon bieten eine optimale Basis für Ihre Personalauswahl + -entwicklung. ✓Innovativ, ✓Valide, ✓Mobilfähig, ✓Schneller ROI
Visit cut-e.deWe analyzed Cut-e.de page load time and found that the first response time was 898 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
cut-e.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value1,750 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value15.9 s
6/100
10%
898 ms
185 ms
186 ms
184 ms
186 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Cut-e.de, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (898 ms) belongs to the original domain Cut-e.de.
Page size can be reduced by 731.8 kB (57%)
1.3 MB
550.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Cut-e.de main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 541.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cut E images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 350.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 350.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 306.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cut-e.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 306.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (57%)
58
25
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cut E. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
898 ms
flexslider.css
185 ms
stylesheet_29afcdc09f.css
186 ms
Default.css
184 ms
slimbox2.css
186 ms
cute_references.css
188 ms
reset.css
190 ms
style.css
275 ms
jquery-1.8.x.js
364 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
272 ms
jquery-ui.autocomplete.min.js
279 ms
formautosubmit.js
280 ms
slimbox2.js
283 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
362 ms
javascript_9a38f34785.js
387 ms
modernizr.js
388 ms
jquery.datetimepicker.min.js
321 ms
parsley.min.js
321 ms
Tabs.min.js
378 ms
Form.min.js
378 ms
custom.js
380 ms
jquery.cycle.all-2.9999.6.min.js
380 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.js
409 ms
cute-tagger.js
409 ms
picturefill.min.js
584 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
cut-e_logo.jpg
289 ms
de.gif
289 ms
sb_facebook.png
271 ms
sb_xing.png
288 ms
sb_linkedin.png
271 ms
sb_twitter.png
367 ms
pfeilbutton.png
365 ms
cut-e-valid-relaxed_02.jpg
622 ms
cut-e-smart-Kran-Tablet_12.jpg
469 ms
cut-e-preferred-Wand_02.jpg
468 ms
cut-e-Motiv-international.jpg
619 ms
csm_cut-e_News_04_3c39e109df.jpg
468 ms
csm_Unbenannt_c8d27ee45c.png
621 ms
feed-icon-28x28.png
619 ms
csm_atp2016-logo_home_43556f2365.png
619 ms
csm_SIOP_Logo_01_f8e8d9dffa.jpg
620 ms
csm_Dice-DDF-_small_149e4feff6.jpg
626 ms
Easter-motive-without-text-2016.jpg
626 ms
csm_WZ150127_67cccde942.jpg
631 ms
csm_Barometer_gross_ohne_Schatten_b2ec41d8f9.jpg
666 ms
sb_googleplus.png
666 ms
bullet.gif
651 ms
accordion-border.gif
700 ms
nav-footer-arrow.gif
701 ms
collect
36 ms
MozmNOw5mws
263 ms
collect
226 ms
ga-audiences
75 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
100 ms
www-embed-player.js
121 ms
base.js
203 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
23 ms
ad_status.js
59 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
66 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
78 ms
collect
2 ms
nav.png
100 ms
cut-e.de accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
cut-e.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
cut-e.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cut-e.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cut-e.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cut-e.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cut E. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: