7.7 sec in total
147 ms
6.1 sec
1.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Cyber Mark content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cybermark.com
Full-service digital marketing agency helping franchises + small businesses grow. Industry-leading solutions include web design, development + strategy.
Visit cybermark.comWe analyzed Cybermark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
cybermark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.0 s
0/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value35.0 s
0/100
10%
Value48,740 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value70.7 s
0/100
10%
147 ms
567 ms
122 ms
496 ms
224 ms
Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Cybermark.com, 11% (14 requests) were made to Widget.freshworks.com and 6% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Cybermark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 124.3 kB (11%)
1.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Cybermark.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 427.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cyber Mark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 55.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cybermark.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 80 (66%)
121
41
The browser has sent 121 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cyber Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 74 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cybermark.com
147 ms
www.cybermark.com
567 ms
gtm.js
122 ms
autoptimize_a3b7dae43fae8ba1994488d183ef16f6.css
496 ms
autoptimize_92f08c5173a8596efbca72c5731cde53.css
224 ms
jquery.min.js
227 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
163 ms
ml.responsive.table.min.js
160 ms
bootstrap.min.js
159 ms
rbtools.min.js
398 ms
rs6.min.js
861 ms
platform.js
241 ms
496735.js
204 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
323 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
358 ms
index.js
357 ms
snap.svg-min.js
843 ms
enlivenem.min.js
852 ms
496735.js
242 ms
rbtools.min.js
850 ms
rs6.min.js
1279 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
873 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
1226 ms
backgroundVideo.js
1224 ms
segment.min.js
1272 ms
ease.min.js
1272 ms
effect-icon-mobile.js
1348 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1415 ms
main.js
1415 ms
menu.js
1454 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1468 ms
animation-column.js
1451 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
1481 ms
sameheight.js
1597 ms
enscroll.js
1594 ms
api.js
287 ms
index.js
1616 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1616 ms
waypoints.min.js
1732 ms
skrollr.min.js
1732 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1747 ms
owl.carousel.cms.js
1845 ms
conversion.js
211 ms
52463.js
232 ms
52463.js
295 ms
frontend.js
1889 ms
analytics.js
115 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1789 ms
lunametrics-youtube.gtm.min.js
1811 ms
52463.js
111 ms
collect
23 ms
bootstrap.js
3 ms
collect
61 ms
ga-audiences
61 ms
css2
398 ms
css
405 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
994 ms
fbevents.js
321 ms
mainLogo.png
1266 ms
mainLogo-white.png
1653 ms
dummy.png
1742 ms
index.gif
1742 ms
1.jpg
1742 ms
2.jpg
1741 ms
3.jpg
1867 ms
14w-1.png
2084 ms
13w.png
2166 ms
12w.png
2166 ms
11w.png
2167 ms
10w-1.png
2167 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2353 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2403 ms
9w.png
2307 ms
8w-1.png
2401 ms
7w-1.png
2353 ms
496735.js
147 ms
496735.js
283 ms
asba.jpg
2323 ms
identity.js
36 ms
251563338525429
86 ms
bbb.jpg
2459 ms
hubspot.jpg
2457 ms
ifa.png
2457 ms
no-image-540.jpg
2474 ms
tiny_grid.png
2499 ms
f.jpg
2414 ms
recaptcha__en.js
169 ms
b.jpg
2454 ms
23421.jpg
2469 ms
e.jpg
2350 ms
a.jpg
2349 ms
d.jpg
2354 ms
cybermark-1.jpg
2459 ms
social-sprite.png
2395 ms
925 ms
iframe_api
979 ms
app.js
1081 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
485 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
758 ms
badge.html
748 ms
6.jpg
1930 ms
48000002131.json
279 ms
badge.css
153 ms
api.js
214 ms
badge_compiled.js
154 ms
postmessageRelay
381 ms
frame.d7ae132c.css
75 ms
widget.js
125 ms
css
158 ms
151 ms
www-widgetapi.js
100 ms
vendors~polyfill.dfc84ba84bc62c66798a.widget.js
128 ms
fetch.41ff875ca8ec9f8757f5.widget.js
127 ms
vendors~core-js.1cf2b85ef8a8b7eab34e.widget.js
201 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
187 ms
1832714284-postmessagerelay.js
319 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
84 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
183 ms
0.96c1c69b8724e56254b8.widget.js
181 ms
1.8bd0d39ed40ee0109589.widget.js
177 ms
8.391e72735dac0c934b81.widget.js
176 ms
10.2e5460d4c197a23f9b8f.widget.js
176 ms
16.940026c58eb98be63849.widget.js
178 ms
styles.5fe92f64.css
156 ms
proxy.html
201 ms
en.json
6 ms
googlelogo_color_150x54dp.png
78 ms
cybermark.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cybermark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cybermark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cybermark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cybermark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cybermark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cyber Mark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: