9 sec in total
364 ms
5.8 sec
2.8 sec
Visit engineering.cotap.com now to see the best up-to-date Engineering Cotap content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about engineering.cotap.com
Visit engineering.cotap.comWe analyzed Engineering.cotap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 364 ms and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
engineering.cotap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.056
98/100
15%
Value7.6 s
47/100
10%
364 ms
21 ms
19 ms
18 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Engineering.cotap.com, 17% (15 requests) were made to Gist.github.com and 14% (12 requests) were made to Public.slidesharecdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.4 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.cotap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 759.0 kB (58%)
1.3 MB
543.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Engineering.cotap.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 559.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 225.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 49.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 225.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Engineering Cotap needs image optimization as it can save up to 39.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 355.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 355.4 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 138.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Engineering.cotap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 138.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (63%)
76
28
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engineering Cotap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
engineering.cotap.com
364 ms
pre_tumblelog.js
21 ms
normalize.css
19 ms
main.css
18 ms
jquery.min.js
50 ms
writecapture.js
13 ms
embedgist.js
16 ms
tumblelog_post_message_queue.js
10 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
12 ms
prettify.js
92 ms
jquery.min.js
120 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
17 ms
main-min.js
16 ms
index.js
15 ms
sprite-1x.png
208 ms
avatar_6cd10cbb854a_128.png
239 ms
like_iframe.html
215 ms
IpfUPkusX23250rZ9vfQ-p_2BkhoyWc2npO0rM3UFT3ZUifuA8ENNLTG4ywmsOiGAyMPA8g4vpAusEMw6jWHmwVCniW0FpRakEZpkgadghU7RgRFWsWNKbIwzuV7wXSlsw
810 ms
adgYAViqOnByoW8fewhAdsL5rSXc9iqQnYDQn8n6fVenXou9Vox9hw2XGhx59Xb71M-KK3oO9cE-kY0KzXSuWXs-ynhVl50T962CdqhLfotd-8Ll-blp3AhuPFL9W2WjaA
418 ms
eloV4ehm4_42EFkkVB-7QtL5RVLNfT5tq7TmK_XH_YH_O3lieVySNV4ERr0cv5cdTAvNInTY-bMbmTWAEHz-cvKHfqkPo54T-_H_U8sd5OJc85yX2bEgfuTv6v0T3cTZkw
934 ms
short-scroll-bad.gif
3621 ms
tumblr_inline_nciprbqJMq1rv5avw.png
222 ms
c26b.jpg
214 ms
together.gif
5376 ms
admin-gif.gif
2129 ms
home-editable-cropped.gif
2907 ms
tumblr_inline_ni0rzcdgCt1qekzaa.png
361 ms
tumblr_inline_n15osbYblH1syz4ei.png
409 ms
tumblr_inline_n15oxfUH8c1syz4ei.png
487 ms
54d5.png
211 ms
a1cf.jpg
211 ms
41162727
341 ms
impixu
363 ms
136c7c5880bdca07da86.js
280 ms
impixu
223 ms
analytics.html
208 ms
login_check.html
30 ms
a1cf.jpg
163 ms
avatar_6cd10cbb854a_40.png
64 ms
iframe_logo.png
82 ms
combined_jquery.js
113 ms
global.js
99 ms
combined_li_tracking.js
83 ms
font-awesome.css
83 ms
combined_presentation.css
96 ms
combined_player_presentation.js
147 ms
combined_old_embed.js
131 ms
54d5.png
274 ms
c26b.jpg
322 ms
a1cf.jpg
463 ms
rapid-3.36.js
36 ms
rapidworker-1.2.js
76 ms
gist-embed-7346e9a735aaeeacede51d1efaad6208f95d9edbc222155878bfddc2da28fa87.css
120 ms
d395ecf19842eeff0813.js
51 ms
combined_base.js
84 ms
ga.js
90 ms
beacon.js
89 ms
ga.js
163 ms
analytics.js
154 ms
d395ecf19842eeff0813.js
132 ms
cs.js
160 ms
yql
269 ms
architecting-for-the-cloud-hoping-for-the-best-prepared-for-the-worst-1-638.jpg
334 ms
41162727
107 ms
lead-form
164 ms
1x1.gif
81 ms
logo_embed_100x20_v1.png
82 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
113 ms
icons.svg
103 ms
status
58 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
33da60e9518e71898bf5.js
47 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
33da60e9518e71898bf5.js
36 ms
34fdff3a9c16e02eefac.js
31 ms
ae8d41db5c98dd532324.js
32 ms
a9fea217e975ab681cbf.js
31 ms
9400086.js
35 ms
9398024.js
29 ms
9397730.js
41 ms
9397905.js
35 ms
9398172.js
38 ms
9398453.js
36 ms
646cbdeebdfc7b681cfa.js
55 ms
rum-track
37 ms
cedexis.radar.js
6 ms
engineering.cotap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
engineering.cotap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
engineering.cotap.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Engineering.cotap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Engineering.cotap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
engineering.cotap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Engineering Cotap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: