1.6 sec in total
108 ms
1.4 sec
90 ms
Welcome to panel.contentstream.pl homepage info - get ready to check Panel Contentstream best content for Poland right away, or after learning these important things about panel.contentstream.pl
Visit panel.contentstream.plWe analyzed Panel.contentstream.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
panel.contentstream.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
2/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
51/100
10%
108 ms
96 ms
190 ms
186 ms
471 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Panel.contentstream.pl, 10% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (660 ms) belongs to the original domain Panel.contentstream.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 252.9 kB (72%)
349.3 kB
96.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Panel.contentstream.pl main page is 349.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 337.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 783 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Panel Contentstream needs image optimization as it can save up to 783 B or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 248.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 248.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 427 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Panel.contentstream.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 427 B or 61% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (67%)
18
6
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Panel Contentstream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
login
108 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.11.custom.css
96 ms
main.css
190 ms
custom.css
186 ms
jquery-1.5.1.min.js
471 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.11.custom.min.js
660 ms
jquery.truncate.min.js
193 ms
custom-form-elements.js
193 ms
application.js
278 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
278 ms
jScrollPane.js
373 ms
jquery.selectbox-0.5.js
284 ms
jquery.labelify.js
370 ms
jquery.customcs.js
371 ms
css
23 ms
logoCS.png
95 ms
text-field-bg.png
95 ms
info_bg.png
97 ms
user-login-bg.png
97 ms
F51BEgHuR0tYHxF0bD4vwnYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
57 ms
wtwJ9UuQFa_G0mIQrZmRFaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
79 ms
panel.contentstream.pl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
panel.contentstream.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
panel.contentstream.pl SEO score
PL
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Panel.contentstream.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Panel.contentstream.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
panel.contentstream.pl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Panel Contentstream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: