Tools & Wizards About Us
webmail.candw.ag screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

webmail.candw.ag

LIME WebMail - CommuniGate Pro candw.ag-migrated Entrance

Page Load Speed

41.4 sec in total

First Response

428 ms

Resources Loaded

40.7 sec

Page Rendered

225 ms

webmail.candw.ag screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Mail Candw content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webmail.candw.ag

Visit webmail.candw.ag

Key Findings

We analyzed Webmail.candw.ag page load time and found that the first response time was 428 ms and then it took 41 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 4 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

webmail.candw.ag performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webmail.candw.ag

428 ms

mylimestyle.css

20315 ms

dummy.css

92 ms

menu.css

97 ms

shadowbox.css

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webmail.candw.ag, 64% (9 requests) were made to Time4lime.com and 14% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Time4lime.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

23.2 kB

After Optimization

18.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Webmail.candw.ag main page is 23.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 17.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 6.0 kB
  • After minification 4.9 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Mail Candw. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

webmail.candw.ag

webmail.candw.ag

428 ms

mylimestyle.css

mylimestyle.css

20315 ms

dummy.css

dummy.css

92 ms

menu.css

menu.css

97 ms

shadowbox.css

shadowbox.css

93 ms

shadowbox.js

shadowbox.js

20314 ms

jsapi.js

jsapi.js

102 ms

menu.js

menu.js

15145 ms

getad.cfm

getad.cfm

336 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

19986 ms

colour_bar.png

colour_bar.png

19986 ms

ga.js

ga.js

222 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

40 ms

small_banner5.jpg

small_banner5.jpg

148 ms

Accessibility Review

webmail.candw.ag accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

webmail.candw.ag best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

webmail.candw.ag SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmail.candw.ag can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmail.candw.ag main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webmail.candw.ag

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Mail Candw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: