2 sec in total
92 ms
1.6 sec
217 ms
Visit webmail.cox.net now to see the best up-to-date Webmail Cox content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webmail.cox.net
Visit webmail.cox.netWe analyzed Webmail.cox.net page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
webmail.cox.net performance score
92 ms
108 ms
165 ms
263 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webmail.cox.net, 54% (25 requests) were made to Images.cox.net and 17% (8 requests) were made to Cox.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (667 ms) relates to the external source Pub-segments.beringmedia.com.
Page size can be reduced by 502.2 kB (69%)
728.5 kB
226.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Webmail.cox.net main page is 728.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 582.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webmail Cox needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 432.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 432.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmail.cox.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (35%)
43
28
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmail Cox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
webmail.cox.net
92 ms
webmail.east.cox.net
108 ms
webmail
165 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
263 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
184 ms
riskminder-client.js
253 ms
presentation.css.jgz
251 ms
presentation.js.jgz
349 ms
bmi.segments.js
201 ms
s_code.js
360 ms
logoff.css
38 ms
login.css
164 ms
bg-main-gradient.png
71 ms
header-footer.png
111 ms
tabs-active-residential-left.png
70 ms
tabs-active-right.png
109 ms
tabs-deactive-business-left.png
110 ms
tabs-deactive-business-right.png
100 ms
dropdown-arrow.png
115 ms
close.png
113 ms
loading.gif
127 ms
divider.png
126 ms
error.png
173 ms
location-or-bg.png
157 ms
form-fields.png
172 ms
nav-border.png
173 ms
logo-cox.png
172 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
117 ms
open-sans.semibold-webfont.woff
499 ms
1
667 ms
divider.png
435 ms
social-you-tube.png
431 ms
social-facebook.png
431 ms
social-twitter.png
430 ms
social-google-plus.png
431 ms
bg-bd.png
439 ms
help-bubble-grey.png
459 ms
bg-input-left.png
79 ms
bg-button-left.png
79 ms
rd
17 ms
bg-input.png
70 ms
bg-button.png
72 ms
lock.gif
67 ms
id
71 ms
s79664127845317
8 ms
event
38 ms
webmail.cox.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
webmail.cox.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmail.cox.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmail.cox.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webmail.cox.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webmail Cox. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: