6.4 sec in total
814 ms
5.3 sec
244 ms
Welcome to webmaster.com.jo homepage info - get ready to check Webmaster Com best content right away, or after learning these important things about webmaster.com.jo
جهزنا مجموعة من العروض الشاملة والمميزة بناءا على حاجاتك ونشاطك، فقط ادرس مواصفات العروض او اطلب استشارتنا لمعرفة أنسبها لحاجتك
Visit webmaster.com.joWe analyzed Webmaster.com.jo page load time and found that the first response time was 814 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
webmaster.com.jo performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value3,230 ms
2/100
30%
Value1.033
2/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
814 ms
694 ms
644 ms
264 ms
515 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Webmaster.com.jo, 20% (15 requests) were made to Jordanwebmaster.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to V2.zopim.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Webmaster.com.jo.
Page size can be reduced by 698.1 kB (50%)
1.4 MB
708.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Webmaster.com.jo main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 743.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 199.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webmaster Com needs image optimization as it can save up to 199.6 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 349.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 349.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmaster.com.jo needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 107.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (51%)
72
35
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmaster Com. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webmaster.com.jo
814 ms
stylesheet.css
694 ms
stylesheet.css
644 ms
mootools-core.js
264 ms
core.js
515 ms
caption.js
509 ms
mootools-more.js
998 ms
yjplanhover.js
680 ms
youversity_slider12.js
651 ms
system.css
627 ms
general.css
592 ms
template.css
515 ms
jquery.js
1089 ms
script.js
828 ms
system.css
270 ms
right.gif
306 ms
1.jpg
305 ms
pageglare.png
302 ms
slideheader0-object914729355.png
299 ms
slideheader0-object678965445.png
298 ms
slideheader0-object1549253221.png
300 ms
slideheader0-object168877469.png
996 ms
slideheader0.png
301 ms
slideheader1-object248369262.png
517 ms
slideheader1-object934489677.png
544 ms
slideheader1-object2084417832.png
536 ms
slideheader1.png
517 ms
slideheader2-object1031874402.png
529 ms
slideheader2-object1910548554.png
991 ms
slideheader2-object515358579.png
1013 ms
slideheader2.png
991 ms
slideheader3-object1503567706.png
992 ms
slideheader3-object1025699529.png
992 ms
slideheader3-object1116937455.png
1462 ms
slideheader3.png
1018 ms
slideheader4-object460025380.png
1019 ms
slideheader4-object1595580556.png
1045 ms
slideheader4-object1263861528.png
1062 ms
slideheader4.png
1247 ms
slideheader5-object2112140379.png
1271 ms
slideheader5-object641536287.png
1293 ms
slideheader5-object1284570121.png
1407 ms
slideheader5.png
1392 ms
footertwittericon.png
1494 ms
footerfacebookicon.png
1521 ms
footerrssicon.png
1543 ms
searchicon.png
1655 ms
nav.png
1660 ms
menuseparator.png
1700 ms
home33.png
1759 ms
spacer.gif
1763 ms
email-marketing.png
1802 ms
slide_sep.gif
286 ms
left.gif
284 ms
yj_plans_holder_l.png
286 ms
yj_plans_holder_r.png
483 ms
title_l.gif
488 ms
title_r.gif
491 ms
dots.gif
488 ms
plan_buttons.png
525 ms
plans_active_l.png
515 ms
plans_active_r.png
977 ms
widget_v2.134.js
79 ms
spam-email.gif
1779 ms
__$$__stringtable_lang_ar.js
18 ms
1.png
1644 ms
bmslogotextplus.JPG
1661 ms
thumb.jpg
1717 ms
shutterstock_62287657-01.jpg
1739 ms
shutterstock_12488026.jpg
1766 ms
Fotolia_4837649_X-02-2.jpg
2479 ms
postbullets.png
1679 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
92 ms
aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==
2 ms
webmaster.com.jo accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webmaster.com.jo best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
webmaster.com.jo SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
AR
AR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmaster.com.jo can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmaster.com.jo main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webmaster.com.jo
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webmaster Com. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: