2.3 sec in total
337 ms
1.7 sec
224 ms
Click here to check amazing 2002 Dartmouth content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 2002.dartmouth.org
Visit 2002.dartmouth.orgWe analyzed 2002.dartmouth.org page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
2002.dartmouth.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value15.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value2,400 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.231
54/100
15%
Value14.8 s
8/100
10%
337 ms
168 ms
697 ms
17 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original 2002.dartmouth.org, 7% (5 requests) were made to Now.dartmouth.edu and 4% (3 requests) were made to Dartmouth.imodules.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (697 ms) belongs to the original domain 2002.dartmouth.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (46%)
2.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of 2002.dartmouth.org main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2002 Dartmouth images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 946.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 946.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2002.dartmouth.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (67%)
73
24
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2002 Dartmouth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2002.dartmouth.org
337 ms
index_fw2.aspx
168 ms
clubs-classes-start.aspx
697 ms
clubs-classes-style.css
17 ms
clubs-classes.css
16 ms
WebResource.axd
19 ms
WebResource.axd
20 ms
calendar.min.css
20 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
19 ms
anythingslider.min.css
21 ms
cms_menubar_v2.min.css
21 ms
compiled.min.css
22 ms
Calendar.css
22 ms
WebResource.axd
22 ms
DefaultPageBundle.debug.js
22 ms
modernizr-latest.js
22 ms
pageview.js
22 ms
dcpage.js
21 ms
jquery.easing.1.2.js
22 ms
jquery.anythingslider.fx.js
21 ms
jquery.anythingslider.js
23 ms
enc-18167.js
22 ms
imod_FloaterDiv.js
22 ms
ajax_content.js
23 ms
ScriptResource.axd
23 ms
ScriptResource.axd
24 ms
ScriptResource.axd
24 ms
ScriptResource.axd
24 ms
ScriptResource.axd
25 ms
ScriptResource.axd
25 ms
ScriptResource.axd
27 ms
ScriptResource.axd
27 ms
ScriptResource.axd
26 ms
ScriptResource.axd
28 ms
appstyles.css
28 ms
css
72 ms
font-awesome.css
28 ms
imodbase.css
22 ms
WebResource.axd
16 ms
e15efd31-a46a-4ef7-9143-727e522545b0.js
139 ms
dc_ccag.js
2 ms
ga.js
91 ms
classes-search-bg.gif
78 ms
1b1f1d77-0d60-4cfe-9534-a3d9c33a8bdf.jpg
52 ms
ajax_content.aspx
234 ms
84027a13-5afc-43e9-a7f3-dfdba0d88490.jpg
61 ms
RSS.gif
34 ms
facebooklogo_1_.png
36 ms
twitterlogo_1_.png
34 ms
linkedin_logo_1_.jpg
35 ms
youtube-logo_1_.png
55 ms
instagram_icon_large.jpg
53 ms
printer.gif
53 ms
zoom.gif
52 ms
fastNavLeft.gif
53 ms
arrowLeft.gif
54 ms
arrowRight.gif
55 ms
fastNavRight.gif
55 ms
loading_spinner.gif
55 ms
logo_dartmouth.gif
55 ms
logo_dartmouthalumni.gif
56 ms
calendarWrapperBg.gif
56 ms
titlebarBg.gif
55 ms
XdmSessionProvider.aspx
230 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
f72ac9d7-7b0f-4322-80c8-25f2b3eb40d3.jpg
6 ms
dam_cover.jpg
221 ms
gift_text.jpg
267 ms
12dd6dfd-68c9-401c-a1a9-85784c0d8d22.jpg
6 ms
olivia-sacks-tn.jpg
26 ms
dnow-quoted-tn.jpg
25 ms
inthenews-marketing-science-institute.jpg
18 ms
jonathan-winter-597.jpg
24 ms
inthenews-foreign-affairs.jpg
19 ms
imodules_common_1_0_2.js
5 ms
easyXDM.min.js
14 ms
2002.dartmouth.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
2002.dartmouth.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
2002.dartmouth.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2002.dartmouth.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2002.dartmouth.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
2002.dartmouth.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 2002 Dartmouth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: