Access danthewaterman.com. Drinking Water Filters And Filter Service In Los Angeles And San Fernando Valley

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

danthewaterman.com

186 ms

counter.js

43 ms

DTWM%20blue%20glass.jpg

183 ms

t.php

75 ms

scc-c2.min.js

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Danthewaterman.com, 20% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com and 20% (1 request) were made to C.statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (186 ms) belongs to the original domain Danthewaterman.com.

Content Size

203.2 kB

After Optimization

115.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Danthewaterman.com main page is 203.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 106.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

Original 4.6 kB
After minification 4.4 kB
After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 59% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 292 B

Original 92.4 kB
After minification 92.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Danthe Water Man images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 84.5 kB

Original 106.3 kB
After minification 106.3 kB
After compression 21.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 84.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Danthe Water Man. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.