2.2 sec in total
172 ms
1.3 sec
754 ms
Welcome to dateclick.ws homepage info - get ready to check Dateclick best content right away, or after learning these important things about dateclick.ws
Visit dateclick.wsWe analyzed Dateclick.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
dateclick.ws performance score
172 ms
543 ms
134 ms
39 ms
441 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Dateclick.ws, 78% (36 requests) were made to Images2.website.ws and 9% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (543 ms) relates to the external source Website.ws.
Page size can be reduced by 199.9 kB (28%)
717.4 kB
517.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Dateclick.ws main page is 717.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 473.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 341 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 341 B or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dateclick images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 144.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dateclick.ws needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 63% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (29%)
45
32
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dateclick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
dateclick.ws
172 ms
index.dhtml
543 ms
layout13.css
134 ms
element.js
39 ms
head.png
441 ms
translateelement.css
29 ms
main.js
73 ms
logo.png
405 ms
trans1.png
405 ms
100.png
404 ms
st_pic.png
402 ms
v.png
401 ms
wp_pic.png
432 ms
sb_pic.png
432 ms
email_pic.png
440 ms
arrow1.png
440 ms
arrow2.png
440 ms
mlm-structure.gif
440 ms
100d.png
444 ms
get.png
441 ms
mike_alan.png
444 ms
test1.jpg
443 ms
test2.jpg
444 ms
test3.jpg
441 ms
bg100.jpg
421 ms
bg_1top.png
419 ms
bg_1.png
421 ms
bg_1bot.png
423 ms
freet_btn.png
421 ms
sign2.png
424 ms
make.png
425 ms
line_make.png
426 ms
sign.png
425 ms
line_punk.png
426 ms
ferr.png
430 ms
yelow.png
431 ms
simbols.png
432 ms
ten_read.png
430 ms
more.png
431 ms
foot.png
432 ms
footer-link-inc500.png
433 ms
footer-link-dsa.png
432 ms
element_main.js
36 ms
translate_24dp.png
46 ms
l
45 ms
cleardot.gif
46 ms
dateclick.ws SEO score
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dateclick.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dateclick.ws main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
dateclick.ws
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dateclick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: