4.5 sec in total
1.5 sec
2.6 sec
363 ms
Click here to check amazing Datinggirl content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about datinggirl.com
Visit datinggirl.comWe analyzed Datinggirl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Datinggirl.com rating and web reputation
datinggirl.com performance score
1455 ms
6 ms
26 ms
26 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Datinggirl.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Theme-fusion.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Datinggirl.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (51%)
2.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Datinggirl.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 814.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 200.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 200.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Datinggirl images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 565.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 565.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 300.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Datinggirl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 300.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (42%)
71
41
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Datinggirl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
datinggirl.com
1455 ms
webfont.js
6 ms
css
26 ms
fontawesome.css
26 ms
style.css
29 ms
media.css
59 ms
animate-custom.css
72 ms
settings.css
53 ms
captions.css
51 ms
layerslider.css
49 ms
flexslider.css
64 ms
style.css
74 ms
jquery.js
78 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
65 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
92 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
107 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
95 ms
jquerytransit.js
88 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
95 ms
logo.png
83 ms
UFoEz2uiuMypUGZL1NKoeg.ttf
12 ms
F51BEgHuR0tYHxF0bD4vwvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
21 ms
yls9EYWOd496wiu7qzfgNg.ttf
31 ms
lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
32 ms
8c9q46CAcsp9TiRX9KLgZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
22 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
16 ms
logo.png
5 ms
transparent.png
43 ms
slide_4.jpg
26 ms
mac.png
38 ms
ipad2.png
42 ms
iphone.png
39 ms
slide_5.jpg
43 ms
ipad.png
66 ms
slide_3.jpg
70 ms
bkgd13.jpg
98 ms
datinggirl.com
1258 ms
bg-popup.png
14 ms
browsers.jpg
13 ms
portfolio_2-460x295.jpg
58 ms
portfolio_1-460x295.jpg
56 ms
blog_3-460x295.jpg
65 ms
portfolio_1-300x214.jpg
68 ms
portfolio_3-300x214.jpg
96 ms
portfolio_4-300x214.jpg
94 ms
blog_3-300x214.jpg
94 ms
blog_4-300x214.jpg
93 ms
portfolio_5-300x214.jpg
122 ms
mobile.jpg
94 ms
logo-footer.gif
8 ms
logo-footer.gif
6 ms
portfolio_1-66x66.jpg
95 ms
portfolio_3-66x66.jpg
90 ms
portfolio_4-66x66.jpg
91 ms
blog_3-66x66.jpg
106 ms
blog_4-66x66.jpg
106 ms
portfolio_5-66x66.jpg
98 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
101 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
97 ms
comment-reply.min.js
127 ms
modernizr-min.js
105 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
120 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
113 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
117 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
186 ms
gmap-min.js
183 ms
main-min.js
183 ms
js
25 ms
bkgd13.jpg
3 ms
common.js
198 ms
util.js
199 ms
geocoder.js
199 ms
loader.gif
35 ms
timer.png
35 ms
ls_prev.png
33 ms
ls_next.png
32 ms
mobile_menu_bg.png
33 ms
arrow-bullet.png
13 ms
shadow-top.png
14 ms
shadow-bottom.png
26 ms
link-ico.png
17 ms
finder-ico.png
10 ms
datinggirl.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Datinggirl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Datinggirl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
datinggirl.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Datinggirl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: