10.1 sec in total
627 ms
3.6 sec
5.9 sec
Visit datingreviewer.net now to see the best up-to-date Dating Reviewer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about datingreviewer.net
We tested hundreds of paid and completely free dating sites&apps to complete our "top 20" list! From hookup to serious relationships - whatever you are looking for, you'll find the perfect platfo...
Visit datingreviewer.netWe analyzed Datingreviewer.net page load time and found that the first response time was 627 ms and then it took 9.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
datingreviewer.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value3.3 s
90/100
10%
Value720 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value3.8 s
90/100
10%
627 ms
17 ms
996 ms
1238 ms
905 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Datingreviewer.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Datingreviewer.net.
Page size can be reduced by 558.0 kB (35%)
1.6 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Datingreviewer.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 906.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 544.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 544.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dating Reviewer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 398 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 48 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Datingreviewer.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48 B or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (25%)
40
30
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dating Reviewer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
datingreviewer.net
627 ms
style.min.css
17 ms
all.js
996 ms
script.js
1238 ms
logo.png
905 ms
en.png
906 ms
pl.png
983 ms
cs.png
982 ms
nl.png
980 ms
de.png
980 ms
tr.png
1098 ms
ro.png
946 ms
no.png
982 ms
ga.png
1093 ms
el.png
983 ms
bg-banner.jpg
1255 ms
benaughty-min.jpg
1171 ms
cork-offer-box-330x280.png
983 ms
together2night-min.jpg
1179 ms
flirt_mini.jpg
1182 ms
onenightfriend_mini.jpg
1349 ms
cork.png
1268 ms
logo-270-180-benaughty.png
1413 ms
TenderMeets-00.jpg
1511 ms
eharmony-min.jpg
1427 ms
hinge_mini.jpg
1516 ms
coffee-meets-bagel_min.jpg
1531 ms
pof_mini.jpg
1600 ms
okcupid_min.jpg
1688 ms
min_Bumble.jpg
1770 ms
christianmingle-min.jpg
1769 ms
facebook-dating_-min.jpg
1776 ms
logo-270-180-together2night.png
1711 ms
hornet_mini.jpg
1854 ms
match-00.jpg
2300 ms
her_min.jpg
1972 ms
siversingles_mini.jpg
2026 ms
tinder_min.jpg
1727 ms
muzmatch_min.jpg
1179 ms
picturefill.min.js
1116 ms
sprite.svg
1312 ms
datingreviewer.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
datingreviewer.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
datingreviewer.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Datingreviewer.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Datingreviewer.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
datingreviewer.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dating Reviewer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: