33.6 sec in total
1.5 sec
19.5 sec
12.6 sec
Visit datingsitesreviews.com now to see the best up-to-date Dating Sites Reviews content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about datingsitesreviews.com
Reviews of the top online dating sites, dating apps, and related services. Find out which matchmaking service is best for you.
Visit datingsitesreviews.comWe analyzed Datingsitesreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 32.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
datingsitesreviews.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value3.8 s
54/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value1,330 ms
17/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
65/100
10%
1469 ms
2030 ms
228 ms
621 ms
621 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Datingsitesreviews.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Datingsitesreviews.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (52%)
2.9 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Datingsitesreviews.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dating Sites Reviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 717.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 717.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 656.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Datingsitesreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 656.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (61%)
71
28
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dating Sites Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
datingsitesreviews.com
1469 ms
www.datingsitesreviews.com
2030 ms
uikit.gradient.css
228 ms
progress.gradient.css
621 ms
tooltip.gradient.css
621 ms
style.gradient.css
704 ms
custom.css
820 ms
forum.css
672 ms
style.css
789 ms
jquery.min.js
649 ms
common.js
761 ms
script.js
1145 ms
jquery.sticky.js
1286 ms
script.js
1284 ms
uikit.js
1350 ms
tooltip.js
1284 ms
uikit_modifier.js
1283 ms
category.css
1347 ms
style.css
1347 ms
rating.css
1347 ms
smilies.css.php
1645 ms
fix_tooltips.js
1330 ms
lightbox.js
1330 ms
platform.js
1262 ms
a2110y7B-53PRTZXRYSPRQZWXXSTPRUWTRXXVWSQQQ
4953 ms
85116vvzntrCEGMKELFCEDHKGFLG
5541 ms
SENIS0ZMT0hDR0pMTUdGQ0dKSktNSw
5463 ms
2a110snrflj468EC6D74658E6ABB
5442 ms
cf81ax0pvtEGIOMGNHEGIFJHMGG
6981 ms
bg_header.png
3440 ms
logo2.png
3440 ms
award-cup.png
3439 ms
category-seperate.gif
3612 ms
facebook.png
3851 ms
au.png
3851 ms
ca.png
4360 ms
gb.png
4359 ms
Title-Favorite-Online-Dating-Review.png
4359 ms
pof.png
4283 ms
Free-Service.png
4980 ms
match.png
4981 ms
Coupons-Found-Save-Money.png
5136 ms
eharmony.png
5137 ms
christian-mingle.png
5137 ms
christiancafe.png
5092 ms
Write-Your-Online-Dating-Review.png
6040 ms
topic-badoo.png
5775 ms
badoo-look-a-likes.png
6041 ms
topic-reviews.png
5774 ms
matchpool-homepage.png
6040 ms
topic-eharmony.png
6041 ms
topic-australia.png
7335 ms
australian-singles-spending.png
7335 ms
topic-tinder.png
7334 ms
tinder-hamptons-party.png
7474 ms
rss.png
7320 ms
reviewimage.png
7473 ms
sdk.js
3891 ms
widgets.js
5451 ms
analytics.js
3890 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
5883 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
1777 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
2582 ms
fastbutton
77 ms
fastbutton
2453 ms
rs=AGLTcCO0a2aya_6t1idksW6Dx_Pt1rBjfA
810 ms
postmessageRelay
2572 ms
collect
834 ms
3288 ms
971028622-postmessagerelay.js
3065 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
2554 ms
button.3ccb64e61d4c01fae12cd2b0ed9b2bab.js
512 ms
imguk-spring-bau-300x250-1504256391739.jpg
633 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
1012 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
678 ms
tweet_button.f8c8d971a6ac545cf416e3c1ad4bbc65.en.html
733 ms
datingsitesreviews.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
datingsitesreviews.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
datingsitesreviews.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Datingsitesreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Datingsitesreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
datingsitesreviews.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dating Sites Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: