2.7 sec in total
284 ms
1.9 sec
509 ms
Visit dazzlepop.net now to see the best up-to-date Dazzlepop content for Egypt and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dazzlepop.net
Digital Marketing Services and solutions Fit all your needs with effective websites and custom social media management services
Visit dazzlepop.netWe analyzed Dazzlepop.net page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
dazzlepop.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value5.2 s
60/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
50/100
10%
284 ms
298 ms
117 ms
201 ms
166 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Dazzlepop.net, 15% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dazzlepop.net.
Page size can be reduced by 538.7 kB (24%)
2.2 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Dazzlepop.net main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.8 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 147.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dazzlepop images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 170.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 201.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dazzlepop.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (55%)
38
17
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dazzlepop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dazzlepop.net
284 ms
site
298 ms
117 ms
bootstrap.min.css
201 ms
font-awesome.min.css
166 ms
owl.carousel.css
176 ms
owl.theme.min.css
164 ms
animate.css
171 ms
main.css
161 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
css
49 ms
css
45 ms
css
46 ms
css
47 ms
css
50 ms
jquery-2.1.3.min.js
310 ms
bootstrap.min.js
274 ms
jquery.actual.min.js
274 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
275 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
274 ms
jquery.isonscreen.js
275 ms
disable.js
335 ms
main.js
335 ms
work1.jpg
564 ms
work2.jpg
377 ms
work4.jpg
456 ms
work7.jpg
438 ms
work8.png
640 ms
work5.jpg
454 ms
work6.jpg
630 ms
work3.png
676 ms
logo.jpg
682 ms
header-bg.jpg
837 ms
number1.gif
464 ms
contact-bg.jpg
1001 ms
AgXDSqZJmy12qS0ixjs6V4nF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
6 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
530 ms
YzfcLalbvpuD9Of73by9cw.ttf
12 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
11 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
11 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
11 ms
js15.js
546 ms
0.php
22 ms
analytics.js
21 ms
collect
12 ms
dazzlepop.net accessibility score
dazzlepop.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
dazzlepop.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dazzlepop.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dazzlepop.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dazzlepop.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dazzlepop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: