Tools & Wizards About Us
deafread.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

deafread.com

DeafVIDEO.TV - ASL Videos & Vlogs - Sign Language Entertainment

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

193 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

422 ms

deafread.com screenshot

About Website

Visit deafread.com now to see the best up-to-date Deafread content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about deafread.com

Enjoy ASL Vlogs and videos on DeafVIDEO.TV. Sign up now for easy access to sign language entertainment.

Visit deafread.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Deafread.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

deafread.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

deafread.com

193 ms

www.deafvideo.tv

697 ms

gppstub.js

86 ms

boise.js

61 ms

abilene.js

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Deafread.com, 56% (40 requests) were made to Deafvideo.tv and 18% (13 requests) were made to Go.ezodn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (697 ms) relates to the external source Deafvideo.tv.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.7 kB (21%)

Content Size

520.5 kB

After Optimization

411.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Deafread.com main page is 520.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 218.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 74.4 kB

  • Original 91.4 kB
  • After minification 83.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 218.9 kB
  • After minification 217.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Deafread images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 134.7 kB
  • After minification 134.7 kB
  • After compression 102.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 359 B

  • Original 75.5 kB
  • After minification 75.5 kB
  • After compression 75.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Deafread.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (34%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

44

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Deafread. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

deafread.com

deafread.com

193 ms

www.deafvideo.tv

www.deafvideo.tv

697 ms

gppstub.js

gppstub.js

86 ms

boise.js

boise.js

61 ms

abilene.js

abilene.js

107 ms

et.js

et.js

108 ms

js

js

61 ms

style.css

style.css

54 ms

css

css

45 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

111 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

192 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

ccpaplus.js

ccpaplus.js

104 ms

mobile.js

mobile.js

81 ms

v.js

v.js

79 ms

js

js

44 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

19 ms

mulvane.js

mulvane.js

29 ms

wichita.js

wichita.js

30 ms

raleigh.js

raleigh.js

31 ms

vista.js

vista.js

81 ms

collect

collect

56 ms

olathe.js

olathe.js

54 ms

collect

collect

177 ms

default.jpg

default.jpg

155 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

106 ms

ezoic.png

ezoic.png

104 ms

default.jpg

default.jpg

151 ms

default.jpg

default.jpg

154 ms

default.jpg

default.jpg

155 ms

ico-search.png

ico-search.png

104 ms

94863237924.jpg

94863237924.jpg

177 ms

trendingfire2.png

trendingfire2.png

230 ms

94863238045.jpg

94863238045.jpg

180 ms

94863238043.jpg

94863238043.jpg

180 ms

94863238041.jpg

94863238041.jpg

178 ms

94863238040.jpg

94863238040.jpg

203 ms

94863238036.jpg

94863238036.jpg

205 ms

94863238035.jpg

94863238035.jpg

207 ms

94863238034.jpg

94863238034.jpg

208 ms

94863238032.jpg

94863238032.jpg

229 ms

94863238031.jpg

94863238031.jpg

231 ms

94863238027.jpg

94863238027.jpg

236 ms

94863238024.jpg

94863238024.jpg

236 ms

94863238023.jpg

94863238023.jpg

256 ms

94863238022.jpg

94863238022.jpg

256 ms

94863238021.jpg

94863238021.jpg

256 ms

94863238020.jpg

94863238020.jpg

258 ms

94863238018.jpg

94863238018.jpg

264 ms

94863238044.jpg

94863238044.jpg

264 ms

94863238019.jpg

94863238019.jpg

283 ms

94863237976.jpg

94863237976.jpg

283 ms

94863237951.jpg

94863237951.jpg

283 ms

94863237934.jpg

94863237934.jpg

285 ms

94863237851.jpg

94863237851.jpg

292 ms

94863237754.jpg

94863237754.jpg

293 ms

94863237812.jpg

94863237812.jpg

309 ms

94863237775.jpg

94863237775.jpg

310 ms

94863237747.jpg

94863237747.jpg

311 ms

94863237216.jpg

94863237216.jpg

312 ms

94863237584.jpg

94863237584.jpg

320 ms

94863237352.jpg

94863237352.jpg

321 ms

94863237403.jpg

94863237403.jpg

335 ms

94863237402.jpg

94863237402.jpg

336 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

114 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

2 ms

vitals.js

vitals.js

47 ms

drake.js

drake.js

37 ms

chanute.js

chanute.js

35 ms

jellyfish.js

jellyfish.js

45 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

40 ms

www.deafvideo.tv

www.deafvideo.tv

637 ms

Accessibility Review

deafread.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

deafread.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

deafread.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Deafread.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Deafread.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

deafread.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Deafread. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: