Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

decker.design

Thomas Decker // UX/UI Design Portfolio

Page Load Speed

8 sec in total

First Response

162 ms

Resources Loaded

7.3 sec

Page Rendered

566 ms

decker.design screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Decker content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about decker.design

Bring your business into the modern age with a custom web design solution that engages users, drives sales & helps your business achieve its goals.

Visit decker.design

Key Findings

We analyzed Decker.design page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

decker.design performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.15

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

decker.design

162 ms

decker.design

4758 ms

style.css

21 ms

font-awesome.min.css

22 ms

style.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Decker.design, 15% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Decker.design.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 456.7 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Decker.design main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 674.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 132.7 kB

  • Original 153.1 kB
  • After minification 150.8 kB
  • After compression 20.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 419.1 kB
  • After minification 389.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Decker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 210.8 kB

  • Original 674.8 kB
  • After minification 674.8 kB
  • After compression 464.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 210.8 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 83.9 kB

  • Original 232.4 kB
  • After minification 232.4 kB
  • After compression 148.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Decker.design needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.9 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (38%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Decker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

decker.design accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

decker.design best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

decker.design SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Decker.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Decker.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Decker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: