8 sec in total
162 ms
7.3 sec
566 ms
Click here to check amazing Decker content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about decker.design
Bring your business into the modern age with a custom web design solution that engages users, drives sales & helps your business achieve its goals.
Visit decker.designWe analyzed Decker.design page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
decker.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value14.0 s
1/100
10%
Value1,600 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.15
76/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
162 ms
4758 ms
21 ms
22 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Decker.design, 15% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Decker.design.
Page size can be reduced by 456.7 kB (31%)
1.5 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Decker.design main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 674.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 132.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Decker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 210.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 210.8 kB or 31% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Decker.design needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.9 kB or 36% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (38%)
52
32
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Decker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
decker.design
162 ms
decker.design
4758 ms
style.css
21 ms
font-awesome.min.css
22 ms
style.css
32 ms
animate.min.css
31 ms
bb-scrollmagic.css
30 ms
style.min.css
35 ms
css
33 ms
style.css
382 ms
uncode-icons.css
257 ms
style-custom.css
362 ms
jquery.min.js
46 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
45 ms
'%20data-breakpoints-images='258,516,720,1032,1440,2064,2880
905 ms
init.js
445 ms
gsap.min.js
31 ms
SplitText3.min.js
42 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
53 ms
MotionPathPlugin.js
64 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
77 ms
animation.gsap.min.js
92 ms
scrollmagic.wp.js
103 ms
plugins.js
548 ms
app.js
562 ms
DeckerDesignLogo-NavyBlue-HexBlue_DD_Hex_LG_Blue.svg
253 ms
DeckerDesignLogo-NavyBlue-HexWhite_DD_Hex_LG_Blue.svg
58 ms
Custom_Icons_HTML-CSS-JS-uai-258x61.png
57 ms
DD-Icons-Design-Branding-Web-03.svg
16 ms
DD-Icons-Design-Branding-Web-04.svg
52 ms
DD-Icons-Design-Branding-Web-02.svg
54 ms
PSD-MTR-Mock-Up-Template-1-uai-258x129.png
59 ms
FI-SAT-MockUp-02-1-uai-258x129.png
59 ms
DSD-Website-Mock-Up-Template-Updated-1-uai-258x129.png
60 ms
PSD-BGTX-Mock-Up-Template-1000px-1-uai-258x129.png
60 ms
B3A-Website-Mock-Up-Template-1-uai-258x129.png
59 ms
Logo-Compilation-for-Web-36-uai-258x32.png
95 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf
82 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf
236 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf
237 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf
277 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZg.ttf
280 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf
276 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf
276 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf
279 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf
280 ms
DeckerDesign16-91500x843-Clear6-uai-258x145.jpg
43 ms
uncode-icons.woff
677 ms
admin-ajax.php
1060 ms
1Ptgg87LROyAm0K0.ttf
200 ms
Background.HTML5_.TumultGrey-uai-258x86.jpg
164 ms
admin-ajax.php
967 ms
grid-pattern-background-uai-258x145.png
111 ms
admin-ajax.php
927 ms
Hexagon-Background-Orange-Trans-02-02.svg
86 ms
FI-My-Tax-Resource-Website-1200x900-1-uai-258x129.png
90 ms
admin-ajax.php
901 ms
admin-ajax.php
891 ms
Photog1400-DasktopParallax-uai-258x135.jpg
52 ms
admin-ajax.php
1045 ms
tech_two-1-uai-258x116.jpg
774 ms
admin-ajax.php
1098 ms
PSD-SATX-Mock-Up-Template-1000px-1-uai-258x129.png
405 ms
FI-Dream-Smiles-Dental-1200x900-1-uai-258x129.png
401 ms
FI-ALL-Websites1250x625-04-uai-258x129.png
685 ms
FI-B3-Analytics-1200x900-1-uai-258x129.png
415 ms
decker.design accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
decker.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
decker.design SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Decker.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Decker.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
decker.design
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Decker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: