997 ms in total
89 ms
497 ms
411 ms
Click here to check amazing Decomposition content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about decomposition.com
Makers of the Decomposition Book - Over 100 styles in stock - Made with 100% Recycled Paper - Printed with Soy Ink - Made in the USA
Visit decomposition.comWe analyzed Decomposition.com page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 908 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
decomposition.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value750 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.466
19/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
89 ms
123 ms
12 ms
29 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Decomposition.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (173 ms) belongs to the original domain Decomposition.com.
Page size can be reduced by 261.2 kB (17%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Decomposition.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 791.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 260.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 37.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 260.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Decomposition images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (88%)
34
4
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Decomposition. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
decomposition.com
89 ms
decomposition.com
123 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
12 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
29 ms
wc-settings.js
28 ms
data-controls.min.js
54 ms
html-entities.min.js
52 ms
notices.min.js
49 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
48 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
50 ms
dom-ready.min.js
53 ms
a11y.min.js
50 ms
primitives.min.js
58 ms
warning.min.js
55 ms
blocks-components.js
58 ms
blocks-checkout.js
59 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
86 ms
wc-prl-main.min.js
61 ms
custom.js
64 ms
custom_owl_slider.js
65 ms
app.js
69 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
69 ms
eva-plugins.js
91 ms
modernizr.js
72 ms
kl-identify-browser.js
79 ms
search.min.js
80 ms
lazyload.min.js
79 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
82 ms
decomposition.png
96 ms
decomposition-white.png
101 ms
hero215-scaled.jpg
91 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf
121 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml2xMB.ttf
111 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf
141 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl2xMB.ttf
133 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl2xMB.ttf
119 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf
140 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql2xMB.ttf
173 ms
hooks.min.js
93 ms
jquery.min.js
17 ms
i18n.min.js
49 ms
Nawabiat.woff
32 ms
Dabrush.woff
30 ms
VendettaBold.woff
30 ms
icomoon.ttf
36 ms
lodash.min.js
15 ms
url.min.js
28 ms
decomposition.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
decomposition.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
decomposition.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Decomposition.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Decomposition.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
decomposition.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Decomposition. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: