4.1 sec in total
662 ms
2.9 sec
453 ms
Visit deeslaw.com now to see the best up-to-date Dees Law content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about deeslaw.com
Visit deeslaw.comWe analyzed Deeslaw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 662 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
deeslaw.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
662 ms
295 ms
274 ms
37 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Deeslaw.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Deeslaw.com.
Page size can be reduced by 195.7 kB (8%)
2.3 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Deeslaw.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 141.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 141.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dees Law images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 457 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 98 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Deeslaw.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (88%)
43
5
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dees Law. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
deeslaw.com
662 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
295 ms
main.min.css
274 ms
css
37 ms
style.min.css
39 ms
sidebar-app.css
291 ms
css2
47 ms
frontend.min.js
287 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
337 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
334 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
554 ms
dom-ready.min.js
549 ms
main.js
566 ms
react.min.js
569 ms
react-dom.min.js
546 ms
hooks.min.js
601 ms
i18n.min.js
785 ms
url.min.js
814 ms
api-fetch.min.js
844 ms
lodash.min.js
845 ms
a11y.min.js
859 ms
deprecated.min.js
607 ms
dom.min.js
872 ms
escape-html.min.js
1063 ms
element.min.js
1064 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
1113 ms
keycodes.min.js
1129 ms
priority-queue.min.js
1085 ms
compose.min.js
882 ms
moment.min.js
1145 ms
date.min.js
1332 ms
html-entities.min.js
1339 ms
primitives.min.js
1351 ms
private-apis.min.js
1363 ms
redux-routine.min.js
1407 ms
data.min.js
1153 ms
rich-text.min.js
1450 ms
warning.min.js
1626 ms
components.min.js
1639 ms
plugins.min.js
1592 ms
sidebar-app.js
1384 ms
DeesLawLogo-435x124.png
1423 ms
maintop.jpg
1442 ms
image2b.jpg
1565 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
23 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf
28 ms
j8_96_fAw7jrcalD7oKYNX0QfAnPcbzNEEB7OoicBw73YWqXNRA.ttf
40 ms
deeslaw.com accessibility score
deeslaw.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
deeslaw.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Deeslaw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Deeslaw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
deeslaw.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dees Law. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: