2.6 sec in total
519 ms
1.7 sec
311 ms
Click here to check amazing Design Like content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about designlike.com
Explore DesignLike.com for top interior design, architecture trends & design news. Get inspired with expert tips, stunning projects & stylish spaces.
Visit designlike.comWe analyzed Designlike.com page load time and found that the first response time was 519 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
designlike.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
65/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value2.5 s
97/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.4 s
93/100
10%
519 ms
25 ms
12 ms
9 ms
10 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Designlike.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 10% (8 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (519 ms) belongs to the original domain Designlike.com.
Page size can be reduced by 292.6 kB (32%)
922.3 kB
629.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Designlike.com main page is 922.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 483.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Design Like images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 179.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179.5 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designlike.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (58%)
64
27
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Design Like. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
designlike.com
519 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
12 ms
responsive.css
9 ms
custom.css
10 ms
owl.carousel.css
14 ms
owl.theme.css
8 ms
font-awesome.min.css
12 ms
jquery.js
20 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
12 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
13 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
24 ms
logo.png
10 ms
opacity-10.png
8 ms
s-right-s2.png
5 ms
s-left.png
3 ms
new_furniture-520x245.jpg
20 ms
New-Year-home-design-520x245.jpg
200 ms
polyester-interior-design-520x245.jpg
17 ms
02-Gable-roof-patio-1-520x245.jpg
17 ms
Financial-Goals-520x245.jpg
18 ms
follow-me-on-pinterest-button.png
196 ms
adsbygoogle.js
10 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
27 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
30 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
30 ms
scripts.js
27 ms
wp-embed.min.js
27 ms
Window-Contractor-520x245.jpg
28 ms
landscaping-project-1-520x245.png
164 ms
Pru33qjShpZSmG3z6VYwnT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
164 ms
Xyjz-jNkfiYuJf8UC3Lizw.woff
166 ms
97uahxiqZRoncBaCEI3aWz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
183 ms
ca-pub-3965973801171805.js
230 ms
zrt_lookup.html
226 ms
show_ads_impl.js
181 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
101 ms
connect.php
149 ms
ads
404 ms
osd.js
5 ms
FbUd6dZS1Af.css
178 ms
dGJLq38YL-C.css
218 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
307 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
383 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
306 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
322 ms
css
115 ms
m_js_controller.js
39 ms
abg.js
44 ms
75633_152654121447357_4385223_n.jpg
178 ms
12342694_10153790179801692_5414764588664898013_n.jpg
202 ms
10153911_935257596559688_4370040921589199996_n.jpg
278 ms
12187826_1056335241052079_2590357025413158193_n.jpg
325 ms
12718119_823958987710277_1615632821033612810_n.jpg
327 ms
12742818_1504437899863455_9171209466900897278_n.jpg
328 ms
12400635_910862205695399_317803148674544136_n.jpg
326 ms
12074970_985049074902750_7698730458412306759_n.jpg
324 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
109 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
108 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
69 ms
favicon
97 ms
favicon
87 ms
favicon
116 ms
favicon
112 ms
s
25 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
97 ms
favicon
71 ms
favicon
72 ms
favicon
69 ms
favicon
69 ms
favicon
70 ms
favicon
71 ms
x_button_blue2.png
10 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
57 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
17 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
143 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
81 ms
ui
39 ms
designlike.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
designlike.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
designlike.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designlike.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designlike.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
designlike.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Design Like. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: